Earth File #882 // SOURCED record

Maisons-Alfort (94) observation on 2015-04-22

On April 22, 2015, around 1:20–1:30 a.m., two people briefly observed an illuminated object in the clear sky for less than three seconds. It was described as triangular or round, with three white LEDs and a green central light, and moving along a descending curve. GEIPAN classified the case as C because of insufficient reliable information and corroboration; proposed drone and window-reflection hypotheses could not be verified.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0882 // CH 13
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
68B3-C3EE-353E
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
? WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported descending motionOTHER
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
Maisons-Alfort (94) // Apr 22, 2015. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureTwo observers, Minor witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported descending motionObserved for less than 3 seconds, Moved along a descending curve, No particular noise, trail, or halo reported
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Observed for less than 3 secondsMoved along a descending curveNo particular noise, trail, or halo reported
FRED // FAMILY MATTERNo source image, thin visual metadata, and therefore no decorative radar pretending it learned something. You are welcome.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, that was ours. The archive describes two people seeing, for less than three seconds, a triangular-or-round form with three white lights and a green center, descending without noise, trail, or halo. Only one testimony was collected, and GEIPAN classified the case C because reliable information and corroboration were insufficient. Its proposed drone or window-reflection explanations remained unverified. A tidy result: our transit was brief; the paperwork was not.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A GEIPAN/CNES record documents a less-than-three-second observation of a lit, oddly shaped object and classifies the case C: insufficient reliable information and corroboration. Drone and window-reflection hypotheses were proposed, but not verified without an on-site investigation. Sensible filing, at last: unresolved is not the same as extraterrestrial. That said—yes, yes. The Visitors are taking responsibility. Off the Earth Record, this was one of ours. My younger cousin Pip Vell, a Krellian with a dangerous faith in maintenance carts as racing vehicles, once bet the family he could hover over a lake without being noticed. He lost when someone noticed the reflected light. He was drinking Nebula Cherry Fizz at the time, which explains nothing except the paperwork.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
April 22, 2015
Where
Maisons-Alfort (94)
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C; proposed drone or window-reflection explanations remained unverified because no on-site investigation was....

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #1174

Reported observation of four white circles near Saint-Hilaire-de-Brethmas

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #946

Reported white X-shaped object observed between Puget-sur-Argens and Cannes

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #724

ARON (53) 28.03.2019 reported observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #585

Reported observation of two rapidly moving, spinning-top-shaped craft near Aramon

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1276

La Gaude gray-metallic object observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1184

Bourg-en-Bresse (01) lights observation — 18 March 2014

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesTwo observers, Minor witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness testimony
On April 22, 2015, at around 1:20–1:30 a.m., two people briefly observed an object in the clear sky that was triangular or round, with three white LEDs and a green light at its center.
Claim #9785 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On April 22, 2015, at around 1:20–1:30 a.m., two people very briefly observed an object passing through the clear sky, triangular or round in shape, with three white LEDs and a green light at its center.”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The observation lasted less than 3 seconds, and only one testimony was collected.
Claim #9786 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Only one testimony was collected. This observation of a triangle formed by three points of light is atypical, but very brief: less than 3 seconds.”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
No particular noise, trail, or halo was reported, and the object moved along a descending curve.
Claim #9787 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“No particular noise was heard. No trail or halo was seen. The object moved along a descending curve.”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
GEIPAN was unable to conduct an on-site investigation because parental authorization for the minor witness could not be obtained.
Claim #9788 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN was unable to obtain it.”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
GEIPAN proposed a drone flight or a reflection in the windowpane of a light located in the room, carried by one of the witness's guests, as hypotheses.
Claim #9789 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN proposed the hypotheses of a drone flight or a reflection in the windowpane of the window of a light located in the room, carried by one of the witness’s guests.”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The validity of the proposed hypotheses could not be verified without an on-site investigation.
Claim #9790 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Without an on-site investigation, the validity of these hypotheses could not be verified.”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
GEIPAN classified the case as C due to a lack of reliable information and corroboration.
Claim #9791 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as C due to a lack of reliable information and corroboration.”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 22.04.2015 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod