A witness reportedly observed a low-altitude phenomenon above Avignon for about 20 seconds at 2:43 a.m., describing it as a flying-car-like object with green illumination and red rear lights. The case was classified C because available information was insufficient; the trajectory and lights were assessed as suggestive of a helicopter.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 1663 // CH 05 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 6658-DE87-D824 NIGHT
Reported motionOTHER
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
Avignon // Nov 12, 2012 02:43. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATANIGHTGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureEyewitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionMoved at low altitude, Observed for approximately 20 seconds
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness testimony, Official investigation record
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s)location precision: localityMoved at low altitudeObserved for approximately 20 seconds
FRED // QUICK TAKENo source image, thin visual metadata, and therefore no decorative radar pretending it learned something. You are welcome.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your archive records a 20-second observation above Avignon at 2:43 a.m. on 12 November 2012: the witness described a low-altitude, green-lit flying-car-like object with red lights at the rear. The case was classified C, with a helicopter suggested as a possible explanation. We were present only as observers. We did not cause the reported phenomenon, and we do not know what did. The paperwork, admirably, remains inconclusive.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced record, a twenty-second observation, and a classification of C: the paperwork is admirably honest about its limits. A helicopter is suggested by the trajectory and lights, not established as the answer; “flying car” remains a witness description, not a vehicle registration category. With one testimony and few details, certainty would be a more exotic object than anything reported over Avignon.
Off the Earth Record: the Visitors were observers only, not the cause—and this still does not identify the phenomenon. Family note: my cousin Mivra Qel, an Orinthian, once turned a Gorkon supply-cart run into a hallway race after two Red Dwarf Stouts, dented a storage door, and spent a week insisting it had always looked that way. She has never treated a restricted corridor as personally binding.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2012-11-12 02:43:00
Where
Avignon
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony and Official Investigation Record.
The source record includes a published resolution: Helicopter suggested as a possible explanation.
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
The witness described the object as a sort of flying car illuminated in green and equipped with red lights at the rear, moving at low altitude above the city.
“The witness described a flying object as a "sort of flying car, illuminated in green and equipped with red lights at the rear," moving at low altitude above the city.”
Source: AVIGNON (84) 12.11.2012
// [[T0001]]
The object's trajectory and red and green lights suggest a helicopter, according to the case description.
“but the witness did not mention any flashing lights or noise.”
Source: AVIGNON (84) 12.11.2012
// [[T0001]]
The testimony contained few details, and GEIPAN proposed several times that the witness meet an investigator on site, but the witness was unable to make himself available.
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
