Noyal-sur-Vilaine (35), 26 October 1990 — reported triangular object
A GEIPAN source records that a witness driving his car reportedly observed a silent triangular object described as as large as an airplane and changing direction. The source states that identification was not possible and classifies the case as D.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 0302 // CH 02 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 8767-683E-EFE0 CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
Reported direction changesTRIANGLE
FRED // CLASSIFICATION DISPUTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
TRIANGLE
Noyal-sur-Vilaine (35) // Oct 26, 1990. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
UNRESOLVEDCLOCK // NOT PRECISEGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureDriver, Single witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported direction changesChanged direction, Moved silently
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness report, Official GEIPAN investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
FRED // CLASSIFICATION DISPUTEThe drawer stays open. That is not permission to write ALIENS on the tab in permanent marker.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
That was ours. The GEIPAN record reports that, on 26 October 1990, a driver in Noyal-sur-Vilaine reportedly observed a silent triangular object described as as large as an airplane and changing direction. The source states that no identification was possible and assigns the case classification D. Correct, naturally. We had not submitted the vehicle registration, flight plan, or explanatory paperwork. This was an administrative oversight, later repeated with impressive consistency.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced GEIPAN/CNES record preserves one witness’s report of a silent, triangular object changing direction, while noting that no identification was possible and classifying the case D. That is a respectable archival conclusion: the report is established; the object’s nature is not. Please resist upgrading “unidentified” to “extraterrestrial” merely because the triangle has good branding. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—we finally noticed us. My relatives have apparently been turning routine field travel into decades of human paperwork. I have asked them, repeatedly, to stop making the shape so memorable.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Quasar Foam
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
October 26, 1990
Where
Noyal-sur-Vilaine (35)
Morphology
TRIANGLE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
UNRESOLVED
Earth Record // SOURCED
Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesDriver, Single witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness report, Official GEIPAN investigation, GEIPAN classification D
“On October 26, 1990, while returning from work, a witness driving his car observed a triangular object, as large as an airplane, changing direction and moving silently.”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
