Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness, person observing from a ninth-floor kitchen window
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, completed questionnaire, field investigation
The observation date recorded for the case is 21 November 2010.
Claim #18837 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
21/11/2010”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is associated with the Pays de la Loire region and Sarthe department.
Claim #18838 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Pays de la Loire
Department
Sarthe”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case page lists the classification as D.
Claim #18839 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
D”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0001]] Case details
At 5:55 p.m. on November 21, 2010, a person opening a kitchen window on the ninth floor observed a luminous phenomenon toward the east.
Claim #18840 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On November 21, 2010, at 5:55 p.m., a person opening the kitchen window of their apartment on the 9th floor was intrigued by the unusual presence of a luminous phenomenon in the direction of the east.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness observed three lights—one red and two blue—arranged in a triangle and rapidly approaching the building.
Claim #18841 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“lights (one red and two blue) arranged in a triangle and rapidly approaching their building.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Description
The witness reported a darker triangular shape outlined by the lights and heard a rustling of the air; the phenomenon disappeared as it passed over the building.
Claim #18842 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness then observed a darker triangular shape outlined by these lights and heard a rustling of the air. The phenomenon disappeared as it passed over their building.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Description
The observation lasted between 10 and 15 seconds, and no other testimony was collected.
Claim #18843 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted between 10 and 15 seconds. No other testimony was collected.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Description
The testimony was assessed as having good consistency because of a very well-completed questionnaire and a field investigation that confirmed the observation elements.
Claim #18844 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This testimony is of good consistency thanks to a very well-completed questionnaire and a field investigation that confirmed the elements of the observation.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Assessment
The record states that the case remains a single testimony with associated uncertainties.
Claim #18845 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The fact remains that this is a single testimony, with all the uncertainties that follow from it (see the investigation report).”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Assessment
The observation was assessed as having a high degree of strangeness and not resembling the best-known misidentifications.
Claim #18846 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“This observation has a high degree of strangeness: the phenomenon does not resemble the best-known misidentifications.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Assessment
The record states that the phenomenon does not resemble any known flying object, while its movement remains within the dynamics of current flying objects.
Claim #18847 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“It should nevertheless be noted that, although it does not resemble any known flying object, the movement of the phenomenon remains within the dynamics of current flying objects.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Assessment
The case is classified D1 as unexplained because of its good consistency and high degree of strangeness.
Claim #18848 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Because of its good consistency and high degree of strangeness, this case is classified D1, as unexplained.”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0002]] Classification
The record lists the phenomenon type as a strange phenomenon of medium or strong consistency and gives a strangeness value of 0.62.
Claim #18849 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Strange phenomenon of medium or strong consistency
Strangeness
0.62”
Source: LE MANS (72) 21.11.2010
// [[T0001]] Case details
