Earth File #2278 // SOURCED record

Mulhouse luminous UAP observation — 15 August 2024

A luminous UAP was reported in Mulhouse with two fixed red lights framing a flashing green light. It was initially motionless above a neighboring house, then reportedly accelerated suddenly and disappeared behind the roof. The GEIPAN-sourced account states that the observation lasted approximately five minutes and that T1 took six photographs during the stationary phase. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as a probable observation of a drone, although municipal authorities could not confirm that explanation.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2278 // CH 03
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
04CD-2AFB-BAAE
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseLIGHT
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Mulhouse, Haut-Rhin, Alsace // Aug 15, 2024. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureWitness report, T1 report 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phaseInitially stationary, Sudden acceleration, Disappeared behind a house roof
Sensor / evidenceCamera, PhotographsWitness account, Photographic evidence
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)11 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Initially stationarySudden accelerationDisappeared behind a house roof
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The Mulhouse phenomenon was ours. The two fixed red lights, the flashing green light, the stationary interval, and the abrupt departure were intentional. Your Earth record reports that T1 took six photographs during the stationary phase. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as probably involving a drone; municipal authorities could not confirm that explanation, while not ruling out a private drone. A reasonable administrative outcome, given that we were not filing flight plans.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A SOURCED Earth Record, and a sensible one: GEIPAN classified the Mulhouse case B, with a drone assessed as probable—not confirmed, since municipal authorities could not verify that explanation. The lights and reported movement are interesting; they are not, by themselves, a passport from another star. The photographs remain part of the record, while the dramatic final disappearance is neatly assisted by a house roof. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, you finally noticed us. It was ours. I would identify the pilot, but the family has already submitted three mutually incompatible reimbursement forms to Gorkon Outpost.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
August 15, 2024
Where
Mulhouse, Haut-Rhin, Alsace
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 2 sensor types, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 11 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Camera and Photographs.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Account, Photographic Evidence, and Official Investigation Record.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN assessed the observation as probably involving a drone; the explanation was not confirmed by municipal authorities..

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #2031

Quillan bright point observation, reported as Jupiter

Shared sensor context: Photographs; shared evidence context: Official Investigation Record.

 Related Earth File #2383

Pierrefonds orange lights observation (reported Thai lanterns)

Shared sensor context: Photographs; shared evidence context: Witness Account.

 Related Earth File #2067

Brienne-le-Château bright stationary light observation

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Official Investigation Record.

 Related Earth File #2028

SEYSSES (31) — Photograph of luminous aircraft trails

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Witness Account.

 Related Earth File #1595

Reported blue and pink lights in Paris

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Official Investigation Record.

 Related Earth File #1568

Rapid blue-green luminous phenomenon observed over eastern France

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Official Investigation Record.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesWitness report, T1 report
Sensor typesCamera, Photographs
Evidence typesWitness account, Photographic evidence, Official investigation record
The observation occurred on 15 August 2024.
Claim #23259 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation date 15/08/2024”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0001]] Case details
The observation location was Mulhouse in the Haut-Rhin department of the Alsace region.
Claim #23260 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Region Alsace Department Haut-Rhin”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified B.
Claim #23261 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0001]] Case details
The reported phenomenon was a luminous UAP consisting of two fixed red lights framing a flashing green light.
Claim #23262 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a luminous UAP consisting of two fixed red lights framing a flashing green light, initially stationary and then moving rapidly before disappearing behind the roof of a house: probable observation of a drone.”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0001]] Summary
The UAP was initially motionless above the roof of a neighboring house, then suddenly accelerated and disappeared behind the roof.
Claim #23263 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Initially motionless above the roof of a neighboring house, this UAP suddenly picks up speed before quickly disappearing, obscured by the roof of this house.”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted approximately five minutes, and T1 took six photographs during the stationary phase.
Claim #23264 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“lasted approximately 5 minutes in total. T1 was able to take six photographs before it disappeared, during the stationary phase.”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
GEIPAN considers the case a probable observation of a drone.
Claim #23265 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“The case is classified B, probable observation of a drone.”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0002]] Classification explanation
GEIPAN states that the UAP's colors and flight behavior are consistent with a drone.
Claim #23266 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The description of the UAP provided by T1 and its appearance in the photographs are reminiscent of a drone, since its colors are perfectly typical of those used in aviation and by drones.”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0002]] Explanation
GEIPAN states that the stationary position and final rapid movement were highly consistent with a drone's flight capabilities.
Claim #23267 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Furthermore, the UAP's stationary position and its final rapid movement are highly consistent with a drone's flight capabilities.”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0002]] Explanation
The observation occurred shortly before the fireworks display closing the Mulhouse fair and festival.
Claim #23268 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The observation was made only moments before the start of the fireworks display closing the Mulhouse (68) fair and festival”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0002]] Explanation
Mulhouse municipal authorities could not confirm the explanatory drone hypothesis because no request to use a drone had been made, but they did not rule out use by a private individual.
Claim #23269 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“However, the Mulhouse (68) municipal authorities were unable to confirm the explanatory hypothesis, as no request to use a drone had been made. They nevertheless do not rule out the use of a drone by a private individual.”
Source: MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 // [[T0002]] Explanation
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
MULHOUSE (68) 15.08.2024 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod