Earth File #1568 // SOURCED record

Rapid blue-green luminous phenomenon observed over eastern France

GEIPAN records multiple observations on 13 October 2013 by four pilots, ground witnesses, and the Chaligny BOAM camera in eastern France. The case is classified A and explained as a bolide caused by the atmospheric entry of a meteoroid, involving a meteorite fall.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1568 // CH 06
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
4415-878C-C1C1
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported rapid motionLIGHT
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Lorraine region and Meurthe-et-Moselle department, eastern France // Oct 13, 2013. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturepilots, ground witnesses 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionrapid movement
Sensor / evidencecameraofficial investigation record, witness reports
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: region rapid movement
FRED // QUICK TAKEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The blue-green passage over eastern France on 13 October 2013 was ours. A modest atmospheric-entry demonstration, conducted with the usual preference for dramatic illumination and minimal paperwork, produced the phenomenon your record describes. GEIPAN classified the case A and explained it as a bolide caused by a meteoroid entering the atmosphere, involving a meteorite fall. Their conclusion remains the Earth Record. Our responsibility remains ours. Gorkon Outpost would have filed it under “routine.”
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classifies this case A and explains the blue-green event as a bolide: a meteoroid entering the atmosphere, with a meteorite fall. Multiple pilots, ground witnesses, and a camera made this one a reasonably tidy piece of Earth-record work. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. It was ours. Please do not revise the human explanation on that account; their evidence supports the bolide, not our family’s travel paperwork. The responsible conclusion remains the one with the strongest documentation. My relatives will be disappointed, but they have survived worse than accurate filing.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
October 13, 2013
Where
Lorraine region and Meurthe-et-Moselle department, eastern France
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Aviation + sensor context

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the witness context includes aviation personnel, the record names 1 sensor type, and the structured record explicitly indicates multiple witnesses. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

Professional aviation witness context and at least one recorded sensor type appear in the structured Earth Record. That combination is analytically useful, but it is not automatic corroboration.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • The structured witness field explicitly records multiple observers without inventing a headcount.
  • Recorded sensor context: Camera.
  • Recorded evidence context: Official Investigation Record, Witness Reports, and Camera Observation.

What limits the record

  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typespilots, ground witnesses
Sensor typescamera
Evidence typesofficial investigation record, witness reports, camera observation
The case observation date was 13 October 2013.
Claim #16475 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 13/10/2013”
Source: [AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is located in the Lorraine region and the Meurthe-et-Moselle department.
Claim #16476 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Lorraine Department Meurthe-et-Moselle”
Source: [AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN classifies the case as A.
Claim #16477 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: [AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The listed type of phenomenon is a meteoroid.
Claim #16478 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Meteoroid”
Source: [AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case summary reports multiple observations by pilots and witnesses on the ground of a rapid blue-green luminous phenomenon over eastern France.
Claim #16479 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Multiple observations by pilots and witnesses on the ground of the rapid passage of a blue-green luminous phenomenon over eastern France: observation of an atmospheric entry of a meteoroid.”
Source: [AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Summary
Four pilots observed the luminous phenomenon in eastern France; it was also observed from the ground and by the Chaligny camera of the BOAM network.
Claim #16480 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On October 13, 2013, four pilots (see the estimated positions of the four aircraft on the aeronautical questionnaire) observed a powerful luminous phenomenon in eastern France, a phenomenon also observed from the ground (see press article), and by the Chaligny camera (near Nancy) of the BOAM network.”
Source: [AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The phenomenon was called a bolide and characterized as an atmospheric entry of a meteoroid, involving a meteorite fall.
Claim #16481 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This phenomenon, called a bolide, was characterized as an atmospheric entry of a meteoroid (fall”
Source: [AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
[AERO HOP,KLM,LGL,BEL] NANCY (54) 13.10.2013 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.