Earth File #2178 // SOURCED record

Loulay luminous object observation — 20 November 1976

GEIPAN records that people observed a round, luminous object in the sky near Loulay at around 7:30 p.m. The object reportedly appeared to rotate, showed an intermittent glow, emitted bright yellow-orange rays, and disappeared along a descending trajectory after about 15 minutes. No more precise testimony was collected; the case is classified C, with the phenomenon type listed as lack of reliable information.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2178 // CH 02
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
BBFC-B26F-6CA4
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported descending motionSPHERE
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
near Loulay, Poitou-Charentes, Charente-Maritime // Nov 20, 1976 19:30. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturepeople 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported descending motionappeared to rotate on itself, intermittently visible glow, emitted bright yellow-orange rays
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedofficial investigation record, witness testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: locality appeared to rotate on itselfintermittently visible glowemitted bright yellow-orange rays
FRED // FAMILY MATTERShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, that was ours. The Loulay observation of 20 November 1976 involved a small atmospheric survey unit using intermittent glow modulation and yellow-orange directional markers. Your archive records the round luminous appearance, apparent rotation, descending disappearance, and roughly fifteen-minute duration. GEIPAN classifies the case C and lists it as “lack of reliable information,” with no more precise testimony collected. A reasonable filing outcome, given that the unit’s paperwork remained on Gorkon Outpost.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The Earth Record establishes a 1976 observation near Loulay: a luminous object, unusual behavior, and not enough precise testimony for anything beyond GEIPAN’s Class C designation—“lack of reliable information.” Sensible label. The description is interesting; the evidentiary box remains stubbornly underfilled. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. This was Zarnok Vell, a Krellian cousin who regarded a restricted observation corridor as an opening suggestion. He apologized afterward with Red Dwarf Stout and snacks, which repaired the family mood but not the paperwork. I am still forwarding the forms across several desks at Gorkon Outpost.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
1976-11-20 19:30:00
Where
near Loulay, Poitou-Charentes, Charente-Maritime
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 10 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Official Investigation Record and Witness Testimony.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C; lack of reliable information.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typespeople
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesofficial investigation record, witness testimony
The case concerns an observation near Loulay dated November 20, 1976.
Claim #22135 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Case details heading
The observation date is November 20, 1976.
Claim #22136 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“20/11/1976”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Observation date
The case is associated with the Poitou-Charentes region and Charente-Maritime department.
Claim #22137 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Poitou-Charentes Department Charente-Maritime”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified C.
Claim #22138 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is listed as lack of reliable information.
Claim #22139 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Lack of reliable information”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source describes an observation of a luminous object in the sky.
Claim #22140 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a luminous object in the sky.”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Summary
At around 7:30 p.m. on November 20, 1976, people observed a round, luminous object in the sky that intrigued them.
Claim #22141 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On November 20, 1976, at around 7:30 p.m., people observed a round, luminous object in the sky that intrigued them.”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Description
The object appeared to rotate on itself, with an intermittently visible glow, and emitted bright yellow-orange rays.
Claim #22142 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The object appeared to rotate on itself, and a glow was visible intermittently. It emitted bright yellow-orange rays.”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted about a quarter of an hour before the object disappeared along a descending trajectory.
Claim #22143 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted a good quarter of an hour before the object disappeared along a descending trajectory.”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Description
The source states that no other, more precise testimony was collected and that information about the phenomenon is lacking.
Claim #22144 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No other, more precise testimony was collected about this phenomenon, for which we lack information.”
Source: LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
LOULAY (17) 20.11.1976 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.