Earth File #2147 // SOURCED record

Conde-sur-Escaut luminous spherical object observation

A GEIPAN record describes a very brief observation on 1977-10-02 in which a female farmer was reportedly flown over by a luminous spherical object, while other people observed an unusual glow at the far end of the field. The gendarmerie found no ground trace three days later, and no further testimony was collected. The case is classified C, with the phenomenon type listed as “Lack of reliable information.”
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2147 // CH 07
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
FEF2-EB6B-1CB7
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionSPHERE
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
Conde-sur-Escaut (59) // Oct 2, 1977. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturefemale farmer, other people observing the glow 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionbriefly flew over a female farmer, passage over a field
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness testimony, gendarmerie investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: locality briefly flew over a female farmerpassage over a field
FRED // FAMILY MATTERShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Not ours. We did not operate the reported phenomenon at Conde-sur-Escaut on 2 October 1977, nor did we send a luminous sphere over anyone’s field. Your GEIPAN record describes a very brief reported passage and separately records an unusual glow observed by other people. The gendarmerie found no ground trace three days later, and no further testimony was collected. Classification C: “Lack of reliable information.” An admirably cautious filing decision. We cannot improve it by guessing.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The GEIPAN record is solidly sourced, but the event itself remains evidentially thin: a very brief luminous passage, a reported glow, no ground trace found three days later, and no further testimony. Classification C—“Lack of reliable information”—is not evasive paperwork; it is the label doing its job for once. Off the Earth Record: this one was not ours. That does not identify what it was, and a clean alien denial is not a terrestrial explanation. Still, credit where due: the file resists the popular human impulse to promote a luminous blur into a visiting civilization before lunch.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
October 2, 1977
Where
Conde-sur-Escaut (59)
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony, Gendarmerie Investigation, and No Ground Trace Found.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C: lack of reliable information.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesfemale farmer, other people observing the glow
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, gendarmerie investigation, no ground trace found
The case observation date is 1977-10-02.
Claim #21822 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 02/10/1977”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified C.
Claim #21823 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case type of phenomenon is listed as “Lack of reliable information.”
Claim #21824 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Lack of reliable information”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Case details
The record summarizes the event as an observation of the passage of a luminous ball with a glow on the ground.
Claim #21825 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the passage of a luminous ball. Glow on the ground.”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Summary
The description states that, on October 2, 1977, a female farmer in a field was flown over for a very brief moment by a luminous spherical object.
Claim #21826 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“On October 2, 1977, at the end of the day, a female farmer in a field was flown over for a very brief moment by a luminous spherical object.”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Description
The description states that other people observed an unusual glow at the far end of the field where the farmer was located.
Claim #21827 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“Other people observed an unusual glow at the far end of the field where the farmer was located.”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Description
The gendarmerie was notified three days later and found no trace on the ground in the area indicated by the witnesses.
Claim #21828 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The gendarmerie, notified three days later, found no trace on the ground in the area indicated by the witnesses,”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Description
The record states that no other testimony was collected that could provide further details.
Claim #21829 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“and no other testimony was collected that could provide further details.”
Source: CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
CONDE-SUR-ESCAUT (59) 02.10.1977 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.