Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesmotorist, driver
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness report, official scientific investigation, simulation reconstruction
The case observation date is 29 March 2016.
Claim #15401 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
29/03/2016”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0001]] case details
The case is classified A.
Claim #15402 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0001]] case details
The listed phenomenon type is Airliner.
Claim #15403 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon
Airliner”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0001]] case details
The case summary describes an observation of a luminous point followed by a black shape appearing to discharge matter, interpreted as an airliner with intermittent condensation trails.
Claim #15404 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Observation in the sky of a luminous point, then a black shape appearing to discharge matter: observation of an airliner and intermittent condensation trails.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0001]] Summary
The description states that a motorist traveling on the A34 toward Charleville-Mezières observed an unusual phenomenon in a clear sky.
Claim #15405 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On March 29, 2017, at 7:19 a.m., a motorist on the A34 heading toward Charleville-Mezières observes an unusual phenomenon in the clear sky.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0001]] Description
The description states that the witness observed a luminous point and later a black shape that could correspond to an aircraft.
Claim #15406 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness is surprised by a luminous point, then some time later observes a black shape that could correspond to an aircraft.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0001]] Description
The observed object was identified as Singapore Airlines flight SQ336, aircraft registration 9V-SKF, call sign SIA336, an Airbus A380-841 flying from Singapore to CDG.
Claim #15407 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observed object was identified as an A380 observed under particular conditions (Flight Number: SQ336 - SQ336 9V-SKF - Call Sign: SIA336 - Airbus A380-841 - From Singapore to CDG): see the attached investigation report.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN explains the apparent stability or low speed through a pivot effect caused by opposing motion components between the witness and aircraft, making the line of sight appear nearly fixed.
Claim #15408 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The strangeness caused by the stability or low speed of the UAP (at least during part of the observation) results from a pivot effect: because the witness and the aircraft are moving in directions with opposing components, the line of sight between the witness and the UAP tends to pivot near a fixed point where the witness, unable to assess the change in dis…”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN explains that the apparent discharged matter was intermittent condensation trails produced while the aircraft changed altitude and encountered variable trail-forming conditions.
Claim #15409 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness thought that matter was being discharged from the UAP, whereas in reality these were intermittent condensation trails because the aircraft was changing altitude and encountering variable conditions for trail formation.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN explains the observed changes in brightness and color as variable sunlight reflections from the aircraft, including reddish coloration as the sun approached the horizon from the aircraft's perspective.
Claim #15410 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The aircraft reflects the sunlight toward the witness (although the sun itself is not visible to the witness).”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN states that the reflection phenomena were reconstructed by simulation.
Claim #15411 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“All these reflection phenomena were able to be reconstructed by simulation.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as A, defined in the description as an observation of an airliner.
Claim #15412 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“As a result, GEIPAN classifies the case as A: observation of an airliner.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
The source description gives the observation date as March 29, 2017, which conflicts with the case details listing 29 March 2016.
Claim #15413 // UNRESOLVED // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On March 29, 2017, at 7:19 a.m., a motorist on the A34 heading toward Charleville-Mezières observes an unusual phenomenon in the clear sky.”
Source: [A34] from NOVY-CHEVRIERES (08) to CHARLEVILLE-MEZIERES (08), 29.03.2016
// [[T0001]] Description
