Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness, driver
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness report, field investigation, hearing, reconstruction
The observation date was 2013-03-31.
Claim #16961 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
31/03/2013”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] case details, Observation date
The case is associated with the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region and Nord department.
Claim #16962 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Nord-Pas-de-Calais
Department
Nord”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] case details, Region and Department
The recorded phenomenon type is "Lack of reliable information."
Claim #16963 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Lack of reliable information”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] case details, Phenomenon type
The case summary describes an observation of a black diamond-shaped form rotating above a field.
Claim #16964 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a black diamond-shaped form rotating on itself above a field: lack of information.”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] Summary
On March 31, 2013, at 5:54 p.m., a witness driving a car reported observing a black-colored, faceted, diamond-shaped object rotating above a field.
Claim #16965 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On March 31, 2013, at 5:54 p.m., a witness, while driving a car, observed above a field a black-colored, faceted diamond-shaped object rotating on itself.”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The source states that no wind was perceptible, the sky was overcast, and no other testimony was collected.
Claim #16966 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“No wind was perceptible, and the sky was overcast. No other testimony was collected.”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
A field investigation, hearing, and reconstruction were conducted with the witness.
Claim #16967 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“A field investigation was conducted with the witness.”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the witness appeared highly sincere, but the observation lacked consistency because there was no corroborating information or additional testimony.
Claim #16968 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“In conclusion, although the witness appeared highly sincere, and a hearing and reconstruction were carried out as they should be, this observation lacks consistency due to the absence of corroborating information or additional testimonies.”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The source assesses the case's strangeness as average to low because plausible hypotheses could be proposed but neither confirmed nor ruled out.
Claim #16969 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“low, since plausible hypotheses can be put forward, but they could be neither confirmed nor ruled out.”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
GEIPAN classified the case in category C because of the lack of reliable information.
Claim #16970 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case in category C due to the lack of reliable information.”
Source: HERRIN (59) 31.03.2013
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
