Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesSingle witness
Sensor typesCamera
Evidence typesWitness testimony, Photographs, Photographic analysis, Motion analysis
The case observation date was October 3, 2018, and the case was classified A.
Claim #14832 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
03/10/2018”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case type is listed as Thai lantern.
Claim #14833 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon
Thai lantern”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0001]] Case details
A witness reported seeing and photographing three colored points of light that formed a triangle, moved slowly and silently across a clear, starry sky, and then disappeared on an ascending trajectory.
Claim #14834 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On Wednesday, October 3, 2018, at 11:00 p.m., a witness standing in front of the door of their home observed and then photographed the movements of three colored points of light.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the three points formed a triangle and moved slowly and silently across the clear, starry sky before disappearing rapidly along an ascending trajectory.
Claim #14835 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The points, forming a triangle, moved slowly and silently across the clear, starry sky.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0001]] Description
A single testimony was collected for the case.
Claim #14836 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A single testimony was collected.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0001]] Description
The UAPs were assessed as low relative to the horizon, apparently fairly close to the ground, and generally progressing from east to west while rising only slightly.
Claim #14837 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The UAPs are visible low relative to the horizon and apparently fairly close to the ground.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0002]] Investigation assessment
The photographic analysis found that the UAPs followed a direction and speed compatible with wind oriented toward SSE at 200 degrees.
Claim #14838 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“After analyzing the photographs, it is observed that the UAPs follow a progression compatible in direction and speed with the wind, which is oriented toward SSE (200°).”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0002]] Investigation assessment
The source states that the low speed of UAPs B and C at low angular height strongly suggests a release close to the witness.
Claim #14839 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The low speed of UAPs B and C, at a low angular height, strongly suggests a release close to the witness that had just taken place.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0002]] Investigation assessment
IPACO image-processing software indicated a possible lantern for UAP B in photograph 225920.
Claim #14840 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The IPACO image-processing software indicates: possible lantern (see appendix).”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0002]] Investigation assessment
The source reports that motion blur of the UAPs in the direction of the wind was visible in one photograph.
Claim #14841 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The motion blur of the UAPs in the direction of the wind’s movement is clearly visible in one photograph.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0003]] Investigation assessment
The source explains the reported rapid disappearance as an apparent effect of increasing distance in the SSE wind direction.
Claim #14842 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness’s perception of a rapid disappearance is explained by the increasing distance in the SSE wind direction, creating the illusion of a rapid escape.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0003]] Investigation assessment
GEIPAN classified the case as A: Thai lanterns.
Claim #14843 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as A: Thai lanterns.”
Source: LAMOTTE-BEUVRON (41) 03.10.2018
// [[T0003]] Conclusion
