Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness, witness's partner
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, no photographs
The case record identifies the observation date as 24 April 2019.
Claim #14732 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
24/04/2019”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is located in the Centre region and Eure-et-Loir department.
Claim #14733 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Centre
Department
Eure-et-Loir”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified A and its listed phenomenon type is LED balloon.
Claim #14734 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A
Update date
28/05/2024
Type of phenomenon
LED balloon”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Case details
The archive summarizes the observation as a brief passage of two non-flashing white spheres and describes it as a very probable observation of two LED balloons.
Claim #14735 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Brief observation of the passage of two non-flashing white spheres: very probable observation of two LED balloons.”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Summary
At around 11:20 p.m. on April 24, 2019, the witness reported seeing two non-flashing white spheres moving side by side across the sky for five seconds.
Claim #14736 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On April 24, 2019, at around 11:20 p.m., the witness was at home when his attention was drawn toward the window. He then saw, for 5 seconds, two non-flashing white spheres moving side by side across the sky.”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness's partner also saw the objects but did not provide testimony, and only one testimony was collected.
Claim #14737 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“His partner also spotted them in turn, but would not provide testimony. Only one testimony was collected.”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Description
The case is assessed as having medium consistency because it involved a single witness with clear information but no photographs and a very short observation.
Claim #14738 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is of medium consistency: a single witness reported the observation, with clear information but no photographs and a very short observation (see the investigation report).”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Description
The investigation concluded that the observation was very probably of two LED balloons.
Claim #14739 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The investigation concluded that the observation was very probably of two”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0001]] Description
The investigation cited the objects' generally straight movement broadly in the direction of the wind, spherical shapes with fixed white illumination, absence of noise, the plausibility of balloons being released in small groups, and the possibility of a child's birthday as explanatory elements.
Claim #14740 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“- The UAP moving in a generally straight line, broadly in the direction of the wind,”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The source states that the official classification is A, meaning a very probable observation of two LED balloons.
Claim #14741 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification as “A”: very probable observation of two LED balloons.”
Source: ROMILLY-SUR-AIGRE (28) 24.04.2019
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
