Maisons-Alfort black line near the Moon, 5 July 2020
At around 20:30 on 5 July 2020, a witness in a third-floor apartment observed a black line just below the Moon and took several photographs. The case was classified A and assessed as a very probable misidentification of the shadow of the condensation trail of flight FR3919, projected onto clouds and illuminated by the Moon.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 1355 // CH 01 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 4437-A3E4-399B EVENING
Reported motionOTHER
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
Maisons-Alfort (94) // Jul 5, 2020 20:30. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINEDEVENINGGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s)location precision: localityslow movement
FRED // FAMILY MATTERAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your GEIPAN/CNES archive records a July 5, 2020 observation in Maisons-Alfort: a witness reported a black line below the Moon and took photographs. The case was classified A, with the archive assessing a very probable misidentification involving the shadow of flight FR3919’s condensation trail projected onto clouds. We cannot identify the reported phenomenon either. This is unusual. Our own filing system has assigned it three forms and misplaced all of them.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classified this one A: a very probable misidentification involving the shadow of an aircraft condensation trail projected onto clouds and illuminated by the Moon. Sensible. The black line’s slow movement and the photographs fit that explanation better than the usual cosmic filing suggestions.
Off the Earth Record, even our side does not recognize this incident. No hidden cousin, borrowed craft, or overdue snack run is available for blame—an irritatingly clean result. Occasionally the correct administrative conclusion is simply that a shadow behaved like a shadow, and everyone may return to their assigned paperwork.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2020-07-05 20:30:00
Where
Maisons-Alfort (94)
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded sensor context: Photographs.
Recorded evidence context: Testimony and Photographs.
The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification A: very probable misidentification of the shadow of the condensation trail of flight FR3919, projected onto....
What limits the record
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
“Observation date
05/07/2020
Region
Île-de-France
Department
Val-de-Marne
Classification
A”
Source: MAISONS-ALFORT (94) 05.07.2020
// [[T0001]] case details
The case summary describes a UAP in the form of a black line near the Moon and identifies it as a very probable misidentification of the shadow of an aircraft trail on clouds.
“Observation and photographs of a UAP in the form of a black line near the Moon: a very probable misidentification of the shadow of an aircraft trail on clouds.”
“On July 5, 2020, at around 8:30 p.m., a witness looking through a window of their third-floor apartment was intrigued by a black line just below the Moon.”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
