Earth File #1343 // SOURCED record

Reported luminous yellow triangular object near Joseph le Brix bridge, Bono — explained as the Moon

On 2020-10-22, a witness reported observing a luminous, intensely yellow triangular UAP above and to the right of the left pillar of the Joseph le Brix bridge over the Auray River in Bono. GEIPAN determined that the observation was of the Moon and classified the case A; the reported position, color, shape, apparent movement, and lines seen through binoculars were explained as effects of the Moon near setting, its First Quarter phase, landscape obstruction, and intervening branches, antennas, or bridge railing.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1343 // CH 02
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
48D4-B685-C773
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported rapid motionTRIANGLE
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
TRIANGLE
Bono, Brittany, Department of Morbihan, near the Joseph le Brix bridge // Oct 22, 2020. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionwitness reported an apparent rapid departure toward the rear, apparent departure was explained as the Moon disappearing below the horizon after several minutes
Sensor / evidencebinocularsofficial GEIPAN case record, witness testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: area witness reported an apparent rapid departure toward the rearapparent departure was explained as the Moon disappearing below the horizon after several minutes
FRED // QUICK TAKEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
It was ours. The Earth Record says a witness in Bono reported a luminous yellow triangle near the Joseph le Brix bridge on 22 October 2020, and GEIPAN classified the case A after determining the observation was the Moon. This is accurate as a human conclusion. Our vessel was simply using the Moon as a visual overlay, with the landscape providing useful concealment. The paperwork, naturally, credited the Moon.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced Earth Record is refreshingly decisive: classification A, observation of the Moon. The triangle, yellow color, obstructing lines, and apparent “departure” all received ordinary explanations. For once, the label on the box matches the contents. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. This is separate AlienBox lore, not a revision of GEIPAN’s finding. My cousin Zarnok Vell, a Krellian, once decided a restricted observation corridor was merely an opening suggestion. He apologized with Sublight Lager and snacks; the resulting paperwork still occupies several desks at Gorkon Outpost. I have asked him to stop turning tidy lunar cases into family business.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
October 22, 2020
Where
Bono, Brittany, Department of Morbihan, near the Joseph le Brix bridge
Morphology
TRIANGLE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type and the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 10 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Binoculars.
  • Recorded evidence context: Official GEIPAN Case Record, Witness Testimony, and Precise Visual Reference Points.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Moon; GEIPAN classification A.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesbinoculars
Evidence typesofficial GEIPAN case record, witness testimony, precise visual reference points
The case record identifies the observation date as 2020-10-22 and the location as Brittany, Department of Morbihan, with classification A.
Claim #14301 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 22/10/2020 Region Brittany Department Morbihan Classification A”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0001]] case details
The case summary describes a nighttime observation of a luminous yellow triangle in the direction of a bridge and identifies the observation as the Moon.
Claim #14302 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Nighttime observation of a luminous yellow triangle in the direction of a bridge: observation of the Moon.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0001]] Summary
A witness reported observing a luminous, intensely yellow, triangular UAP above and to the right of the left pillar of the Joseph le Brix bridge, above the Auray River, west of the witness's position, in Bono.
Claim #14303 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On October 22, 2020, at around 11:20 p.m., a witness observed, first with the naked eye and then using binoculars, a UAP in the shape of a triangle.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0001]] Description
The case record states that the testimony was complete and had precise reference points, and that the case's consistency was considered good despite there being only one witness.
Claim #14304 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Although there was only one witness, the consistency* of the case is considered good, the testimony being complete, with precise reference points.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN determined after investigation that the witness had observed the Moon.
Claim #14305 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“After investigation, it was determined that the witness had in fact observed the Moon (see the investigation report).”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0002]] investigation explanation
The reported position of the UAP coincided with the Moon near setting, and the reported yellow color was consistent with the Moon near the horizon.
Claim #14306 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The position of the UAP reported by the witness coincides perfectly with that of the Moon near setting.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0002]] investigation explanation
The report states that the Moon's First Quarter phase provided a shape corresponding to the reported UAP if its lower part was hidden by the landscape.
Claim #14307 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“In addition, since the Moon was in its First Quarter phase, its shape corresponded well to that of the UAP if its lower part was hidden by the landscape.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0002]] investigation explanation
The black lines seen through binoculars were considered compatible with branches, antennas, or the bridge railing overlapping the Moon's image.
Claim #14308 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The black lines seen through the binoculars are compatible with branches, antennas, or even the bridge railing, which overlapped the image of the Moon.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0002]] investigation explanation
The UAP's reported rapid departure toward the rear was explained as the Moon disappearing below the horizon after a few minutes of observation.
Claim #14309 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The UAP's rapid departure toward the rear can be explained by the Moon disappearing below the horizon after a few minutes of observation.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0002]] investigation explanation
The case is classified A as an observation of the Moon.
Claim #14310 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is classified A, observation of the Moon.”
Source: BONO (56) 22.10.2020 // [[T0002]] conclusion
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
BONO (56) 22.10.2020 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.