Earth File #1300 // SOURCED record

Reported fireball observation near Meaux on 25 November 2021

A witness reportedly observed a luminous phenomenon near the Ourcq Canal in Meaux, Île-de-France, on 25 November 2021. The phenomenon was described as moving first in a slightly zigzagging manner and then in a straight line, with flame-like lights and a short smoke trail. GEIPAN classified the case as an A-level fireball observation and assessed the reported features as explained by a fireball.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1300 // CH 13
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
DBC8-9A78-B018
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported direction changesLIGHT
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Near the Ourcq Canal, Meaux, Île-de-France, Seine-et-Marne // Nov 25, 2021. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported direction changesmoved in a slightly zigzagging manner, continued in a straight line, appeared to ignite on its left side
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness testimony, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: locality moved in a slightly zigzagging mannercontinued in a straight lineappeared to ignite on its left side
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes. The reported phenomenon near Meaux was ours. Your archive records a luminous event that appeared to move slightly irregularly, then straight, with flame-like lights and a short smoke trail. GEIPAN classified it as an A-level fireball and assessed those features as explained by a fireball; that remains the Earth Record. We are merely clarifying the editorial layer. The transit was routine. The paperwork was not, naturally.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The Earth Record is unusually tidy: GEIPAN classified this as an A-level fireball, with the reported flame-like lights and smoke trail explained by that assessment. One witness and no photographs still make the testimony only moderately consistent, but the conclusion is refreshingly less dramatic than the opening description. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. Please keep that separate from the evidence, and kindly stop filing our relatives’ atmospheric paperwork under “mysterious aircraft.”
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
November 25, 2021
Where
Near the Ourcq Canal, Meaux, Île-de-France, Seine-et-Marne
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony, Official Scientific Investigation, No Photographs, and Corresponding Fireball Trajectory.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Fireball.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, official scientific investigation, no photographs, corresponding fireball trajectory
The case concerns an observation dated 25 November 2021 in the Île-de-France region and Seine-et-Marne department, classified as type Fireball with classification A.
Claim #13893 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation date 25/11/2021 Region Île-de-France Department Seine-et-Marne Classification A Date updated 24/04/2023 Type of phenomenon Fireball”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0001]] Case details metadata
The case summary describes a luminous phenomenon that moved in a zigzagging and then rectilinear manner and was followed by a short smoke trail.
Claim #13894 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the zigzagging and then rectilinear movement of a luminous phenomenon followed by a short trail of smoke: observation of a fireball.”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0001]] Summary
On November 25, 2021, at 06:36 local time, the witness was running along the Ourcq Canal near Meaux, heard a strange noise, looked up, and saw what he thought was an airplane with unusual lights like flames.
Claim #13895 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On November 25, 2021, at 06:36 (local time), while out for his morning run along the Ourcq Canal, near Meaux, the witness, alerted by a strange noise, looked up at the sky and saw what he thought was an airplane, with unusual lights (like flames).”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported seeing a short, slightly zigzagging smoke trail approximately 1 cm wide and later reported that the object appeared to catch fire on its left side while continuing in a straight line.
Claim #13896 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“He observed a short, slightly zigzagging trail of smoke approximately 1 cm wide.”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0001]] Description
At around 07:30, the witness observed a trail of smoke in the sky from the Meaux beach in Parc du Pâtis while looking east.
Claim #13897 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“At the end of his run, at around 07:30, on the Meaux beach in Parc du Pâtis, looking east, the witness observed a trail of smoke in the sky.”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
A single testimony was collected, and GEIPAN assessed the testimony as having average consistency because there were no photographs, although the witness answered the investigator's questions precisely.
Claim #13898 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This testimony is of average consistency: there was only one testimony and no photographs, but the witness answered the investigator’s questions precisely (see the investigation report).”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0002]] Assessment
GEIPAN assessed that the perceived flame-like lights, ignition, and smoke trail were explained by the fireball hypothesis.
Claim #13900 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The features perceived as unusual by the witness—lights like flames, ignition, and a trail of smoke—are explained by the fireball hypothesis.”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0002]] Explanation
GEIPAN assessed that the transient noise may have come from the surroundings, notably one of two railway lines located 1.5 and 3.3 km from the witness.
Claim #13901 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“this transient noise may have come from the surroundings, notably from one of the two railway lines located 1.5 and 3.3 km from the witness.”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0002]] Explanation
GEIPAN classified the case as A, identifying it as an observation of a fireball.
Claim #13902 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as A: observation of a fireball.”
Source: CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 // [[T0002]] Final classification
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
CREGY-LES-MEAUX (77) 25.11.2021 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.