Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness, motorist
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typestestimony, official scientific investigation
The case observation date was 6 March 2015.
Claim #10327 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation date
06/03/2015”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified as B.
Claim #10328 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification
B”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0001]] Case details
The listed phenomenon type was tethered balloon.
Claim #10329 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Tethered balloon”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case was associated with the Midi-Pyrénées region and Haute-Garonne department.
Claim #10330 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Region
Midi-Pyrénées
Department
Haute-Garonne”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case summary describes a black, ovoid-shaped object reflecting sunlight, appearing to move slowly, and then disappearing rapidly; it identifies a probable tethered solar balloon as the explanation.
Claim #10331 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation of a black, ovoid-shaped object, reflecting the brightness of the sun and appearing to move slowly; rapid disappearance: probable observation of a tethered solar balloon.”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0001]] Summary
The witness was traveling by car on the D112 near Lavalette and observed the object at approximately 8:30 a.m. near “Grousset.”
Claim #10332 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“On March 6, 2015, the witness was in a car on the D112, near Lavalette (31), and was going to his place of work.”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0001]] Description
The object was observed in a clear sky and was described as approximately above the road, with a small white horizontal trail and slight orange coloration on one edge.
Claim #10333 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“having a small white trail extending horizontally from its base. A slight orange coloration was also present on one of the edges of the UAP.”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0002]] Description
After observing the UAP for approximately two minutes, the witness looked toward a mobile phone and the UAP had disappeared when he looked back.
Claim #10334 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“After observing it for approximately two minutes, the witness wanted to pick up his mobile phone, which was on the passenger seat, and diverted his attention for a brief moment. When he wanted to observe the UAP again, it had disappeared.”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0002]] Description
Only one testimony was collected.
Claim #10335 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Only one testimony was collected.”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN assessed that the UAP's appearance and movement matched those of a tethered solar balloon launched from a field to the witness's right.
Claim #10336 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“The UAP has the appearance and movement of a tethered solar balloon launched from a field located to the witness’s right (see the investigation report).”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0002]] Assessment
GEIPAN stated that the apparent rapid descent could be explained by balloon disintegration or by a spinnaker effect related to wind.
Claim #10337 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“This descent can be explained by the balloon’s disintegration or by its being driven down to the ground by a spinnaker effect (related to the wind).”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0003]] Assessment
GEIPAN classified the case as B because of the strong conformity of the object's appearance with a balloon and an explanation for its rapid descent.
Claim #10338 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Because of the strong conformity of its appearance with a balloon and an explanation for the latter’s rapid descent, GEIPAN classifies the case as B: probable observation of a tethered solar balloon.”
Source: LAVALETTE (31) 06.03.2015
// [[T0003]] Conclusion