Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, no photograph reported
The case concerns an observation dated 2003-12-05 in the Île-de-France region and Essonne department.
Claim #1128 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
05/12/2003
Region
Île-de-France
Department
Essonne”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified B and its listed phenomenon type is Paraselene.
Claim #1129 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
B
Date updated
23/06/2021
Phenomenon type
Paraselene”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0001]] Case details
A witness reported seeing an immobile white oval shape in the clear sky between 8:00 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. on December 5, 2003.
Claim #1130 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On December 5, 2003, between 8:00 p.m. and 8:30 p.m., a witness was telephoning one of his friends while facing the window when he observed an immobile, white oval shape in the clear sky.”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0001]] Description
According to the report, the shape was very close to the Moon, nearly identical in size, and had the same color and intensity as the Moon; the observation lasted between 15 and 20 seconds.
Claim #1131 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This shape was very close to the Moon, almost identical in size, and of the same color and intensity as the Moon.”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0001]] Description
The case record states that the glow disappeared quickly and that only one testimony was collected.
Claim #1132 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The glow disappeared quickly. The observation lasted between 15 and 20 seconds. Only one testimony was collected regarding this phenomenon.”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN assesses the case as a probable observation of an optical atmospheric phenomenon called a paraselene.
Claim #1133 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“this case is a probable observation of an optical atmospheric phenomenon called a paraselene”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
The source cites the brief observation, single witness, absence of a photograph, late testimony, inconsistency concerning the Moon's reported and actual positions, and atmospheric conditions as reasons for the case's low strangeness and consistency.
Claim #1134 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Due to its low level of strangeness and consistency (short observation of 20 seconds,”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0001]] Description
The testimony was recorded in June 2014, nearly ten years after the observation, and the source states that this may have led to memory errors.
Claim #1135 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“It should also be noted that the late testimony, nearly 10 years after the events, certainly led to memory errors (starry sky and position of the Moon).”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
The case is classified B as a probable observation of a paraselene.
Claim #1136 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified B, probable observation of a paraselene.”
Source: GIF-SUR-YVETTE (91) 05.12.2003
// [[T0002]] Description continuation