Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesMotorist, Second driver
Sensor typesFRIPON network sensor
Evidence typesWitness testimony, Corroborating second-witness report, FRIPON sensor detection, No photograph or video
The case observation date is 26 August 2021.
Claim #7709 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
26/08/2021”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified B and its phenomenon type is Fireball.
Claim #7710 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
B
Update date
02/07/2025
Phenomenon type
Fireball”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN summarizes the observation as a very brief flash followed by a blue ball on the horizon and considers it a probable observation of a fireball.
Claim #7711 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A very brief observation of a “flash” in the sky followed by a “blue ball” on the horizon: probable observation of a fireball.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0001]] Summary
A motorist traveling south on the D137 reported an unusual luminous phenomenon upon leaving Sainte-Gemme-la-Plaine in Vendée.
Claim #7712 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“During the night of 25–26 August 2021, a motorist traveling south on the D137 reported observing an unusual luminous phenomenon upon leaving the municipality of SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (Vendée).”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness described an intense flash comparable to lightning at altitude despite a clear sky and a visible Moon.
Claim #7713 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“He described an intense flash, comparable to a lightning flash at altitude, although the sky was clear and the Moon clearly visible.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0001]] Description
The reported blue light remained visible for between one and five seconds, and the witness estimated that it was slightly smaller than the Moon with slightly blurred contours.
Claim #7714 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This light remained visible for between one and five seconds.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
The driver of the vehicle ahead perceived a flash and bluish coloration but did not distinguish the ball; this second witness declined to provide an official testimony.
Claim #7715 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The driver of the vehicle ahead of him also perceived a flash and a bluish coloration, but did not distinguish the ball.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN assessed the case consistency as average because there were two witnesses but only one testimony and no photograph or video of the UAP.
Claim #7716 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The consistency* of this case is considered average: two witnesses, but a single testimony, and no photograph or video of the UAP.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN assessed that the brief observation was compatible with a fireball, with the flash potentially corresponding to the atmospheric entry of a meteoroid.
Claim #7718 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The description of the UAP, particularly the brevity of the observation, is compatible with the hypothesis that a fireball was observed, with the luminous flash potentially corresponding to the atmospheric entry of a meteoroid (see investigation report).”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
The investigation states that the phenomenon could not have been lightning because no storm activity was detected at the time.
Claim #7719 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“It cannot have been lightning, even distant lightning, since no storm activity was detected at the time of the observation.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
A fireball was detected from Rome, Italy, at a time compatible with the observation by a sensor belonging to the FRIPON network.
Claim #7721 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 91% extraction confidence
“Furthermore, a fireball was detected from Rome (Italy) at a time compatible with that of the observation, by a sensor belonging to the FRIPON network.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
The absence of trajectory data made it impossible to determine the precise direction of movement.
Claim #7722 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“However, the absence of trajectory data makes it impossible to determine the precise direction of its movement.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
The source states that the blue-ball appearance could be due to retinal persistence.
Claim #7723 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The blue-ball appearance, for its part, could be due to retinal persistence.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0003]] Description
The case is classified B as a probable observation of a fireball.
Claim #7724 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is classified “B,” probable observation of a fireball.”
Source: [D137] FROM SAINTE-GEMME-LA-PLAINE (85) TOWARD MOREILLES (85) 26.08.2021
// [[T0003]] Description