Earth File #67 // SOURCED record

Reported yellow-orange luminous ball observation near Bonneville-Annemasse

GEIPAN records that, at around 21:20 on May 10, 2004, two independent witnesses reportedly observed the very rapid passage of a yellow-orange luminous ball in Haute-Savoie, Rhône-Alpes. The witnesses differed on whether its movement was horizontal or vertical. The case is classified B, and the source identifies the observation as probably an atmospheric reentry.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0067 // CH 08
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
EF66-BB87-B5C3
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported rapid motionSPHERE
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
Haute-Savoie, Rhône-Alpes // May 10, 2004 21:20. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturetwo independent witnesses 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionvery rapid passage, movement described inconsistently as horizontal or vertical
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness testimonies, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: region very rapid passagemovement described inconsistently as horizontal or vertical
FRED // QUICK TAKEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
That was ours. On 10 May 2004, our transit unit crossed the Haute-Savoie region at approximately 21:20, using the yellow-orange luminous configuration humans find unnecessarily memorable. Your archive reports that two independent witnesses observed a very rapid passage, though their accounts differed on horizontal versus vertical movement. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as probably an atmospheric reentry. A reasonable assessment, from a distance. We were not reentering anything. We were leaving.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classifies this as a B case and identifies the observation as probably an atmospheric reentry. Sensible filing: two witnesses saw a very rapid yellow-orange light, while disagreeing about whether it moved horizontally or vertically. Human perception remains stubbornly three-dimensional and disappointingly approximate. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. This does not revise the human record’s explanation or turn a probable reentry into an extraterrestrial conclusion; it merely means one of my relatives has once again mistaken a dramatic entrance for adequate documentation. I will be requesting the flight log. Again.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2004-05-10 21:20:00
Where
Haute-Savoie, Rhône-Alpes
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typestwo independent witnesses
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimonies, official scientific investigation
The case observation date was May 10, 2004.
Claim #1055 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 10/05/2004”
Source: BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was located in the Rhône-Alpes region and Haute-Savoie department.
Claim #1056 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Rhône-Alpes Department Haute-Savoie”
Source: BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified B.
Claim #1057 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source identifies the summary as a probable observation of an atmospheric reentry.
Claim #1058 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Probable observation of an atmospheric reentry”
Source: BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 // [[T0001]] Summary
At around 9:20 p.m. on May 10, 2004, two independent witnesses observed the very rapid passage of a yellow-orange luminous ball.
Claim #1059 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On May 10, 2004, at around 9:20 p.m., two independent witnesses observed the very rapid passage of a yellow-orange luminous ball.”
Source: BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 // [[T0001]] Description
The two testimonies were not entirely consistent about the movement: one described horizontal movement and the other vertical movement.
Claim #1060 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Although the two testimonies are not entirely consistent regarding the movement (horizontal movement for one witness and vertical movement for the other)”
Source: BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 // [[T0001]] Description
The source states that there is little doubt that the witnesses observed an atmospheric reentry.
Claim #1061 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“there is little doubt that the witnesses observed an atmospheric reentry.”
Source: BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
BONNEVILLE-ANNEMASSE (74) 2004 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.