Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesoperations duty officer, watch personnel
Sensor typesradar
Evidence typesvisual testimony, radar detection, official scientific investigation
The case concerns an observation on 23 April 1978 in Upper Normandy's Eure department.
Claim #7069 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
23/04/1978
Region
Upper Normandy
Department
Eure”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0001]] case details
Between 20:35 UTC and 20:51 UTC, an operations duty officer at Air Base 105 in Évreux observed a red luminous point at an altitude between 10° and 15° and estimated its bearing at 300 from Évreux base.
Claim #7070 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On Sunday, 23 April 1978, between 20:35 UTC and 20:51 UTC, following a telephone call, an operations duty officer at Air Base 105 in Évreux (27) observed a red luminous point at an altitude between 10° and 15°: its position was estimated at bearing 300 from Évreux base.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0001]] Description
Watch personnel also observed the phenomenon, and its luminous intensity decreased.
Claim #7071 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The watch personnel also observed the phenomenon, whose luminous intensity decreased.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0001]] Description
At 20:44 UTC, radar detected an echo at bearing 300 from the station, 18 nautical miles away, moving toward bearing 330 at an estimated speed of 30 to 40 knots.
Claim #7072 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The officer requested radar assistance, and at 20:44 UTC it detected an echo at bearing 300 from the station, at a distance of 18 nautical miles, moving toward bearing 330 at an estimated speed of 30 to 40 knots.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0001]] Description
The visual observations ended and radar operation ceased at 20:51 UTC.
Claim #7073 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“marked the end of the visual observations and the cessation of radar operation.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
The radar recording was unavailable; the radar trace had very low intensity rated 1/5 but lasted 7 minutes.
Claim #7076 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“for which we unfortunately do not have the recording and whose very low intensity (1/5), but long duration (7 minutes), should be noted.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
Only one testimony was collected.
Claim #7077 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Only one testimony was collected.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
The GEPAN investigation rejected the helicopter and balloon hypotheses.
Claim #7078 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The GEPAN investigation rejected the helicopter and balloon hypotheses.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
The investigation states that confusion with Venus appears extremely unlikely because the reported phenomenon's position differed notably from Venus's position.
Claim #7079 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“Nevertheless, since the PAN’s position was notably different (azimuth 300° to 330° and elevation 10° to 15°), confusion with Venus appears extremely unlikely.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
The low-intensity radar measurement was not confirmed by the other radar at Cinq-Mars-La-Pile and should be treated cautiously.
Claim #7080 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The low-intensity radar measurement, not confirmed by the other radar at Cinq-Mars-La-Pile, must be considered with caution.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
A false radar echo, such as a secondary reflection, cannot be ruled out.
Claim #7081 // UNRESOLVED // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A false echo cannot be ruled out, for example a secondary reflection.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as D1, describing the phenomenon as moderately strange and distant and the testimony as of good consistency.
Claim #7082 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as D1: the phenomenon is moderately strange and distant, but the testimony is of good consistency.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0002]] Description
The case record describes the observation as a moving red point in the sky accompanied by a weak radar echo lasting 7 minutes.
Claim #7083 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a moving red point in the sky and a weak radar echo lasting 7 minutes: moderately strange unidentified phenomenon.”
Source: FAUVILLE (27) 23.04.1978
// [[T0001]] Summary