Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesfirst witness, second witness, other residents
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness reports, reported television-reception disruption, reported livestock problems, official GEIPAN investigation
The observation occurred on May 8, 1980, at around 9:15 p.m.
Claim #5677 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On May 8, 1980, at around 9:15 p.m., alerted by the barking of her dog, a person went out into her yard and saw a luminous shape in the sky.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
The first witness described the object as a large orange-red spinning top or as two upside-down hollow plates one on top of the other.
Claim #5678 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness described a large orange-red spinning top or an object resembling “two upside-down hollow plates, one on top of the other.””
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
A second witness reportedly saw a red-and-orange ball like fire moving across the sky.
Claim #5679 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The witness immediately called her neighbor, who also saw a red-and-orange ball like fire moving across the sky.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
The reported UAP moved rapidly along a straight-line trajectory from Buxy through La Ferté to Sennecey-le-Grand at low altitude.
Claim #5680 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The UAP moved rapidly along a straight-line trajectory Buxy–La Ferté–Sennecey-le-Grand at low altitude.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
Other residents confirmed that television reception had been disrupted, and they reported problems affecting livestock.
Claim #5681 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 94% extraction confidence
“They also reported problems affecting their livestock.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN assessed the case as a probable misidentification of a short aircraft contrail illuminated at high altitude by the setting sun.
Claim #5682 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case appears to be a probable misidentification of a short aircraft contrail illuminated at high altitude by the setting sun.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
The assessment was based partly on the reported rounded or plate-like shape, orange-red color, high luminosity, uninterrupted movement, and the observation shortly after sunset.
Claim #5683 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This conclusion is based on the following elements (see the investigation report):”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
The presence of a commercial airliner in the relevant direction was considered plausible but could not be verified 40 years later.
Claim #5684 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The presence of a commercial airliner in this direction is plausible, but cannot be verified 40 years later.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
The observation coincided with a nearby storm, inferred from secondary effects including dog agitation and television failures.
Claim #5685 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 94% extraction confidence
“The observation of this contrail coincided with a nearby storm, which the witnesses did not describe but whose secondary effects are found in the agitation of the dogs in the surrounding area and in television failures.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description
The case was classified B as a probable observation of an aircraft contrail.
Claim #5686 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Consequently, the case is classified B: probable observation of an aircraft contrail.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0003]] Conclusion
The case had previously been classified D and was later reexamined.
Claim #5687 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This observation case, previously classified D and named BUXY (71) 1980, is part of a set of cases recently reexamined.”
Source: SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-BUXY (71) 08.05.1980
// [[T0002]] Description