Earth File #50 // SOURCED record

Reported gray hourglass-shaped object near AF 7705

A sourced GEIPAN case records a brief observation on 2005-07-07 in Val-d'Oise. The captain of flight AF 7705 reported that the aircraft passed within approximately half a nautical mile of a gray, apparently stationary object near Charles de Gaulle Airport. The object was described as metallic and hourglass-like; no radar echo was reported. It was not identified, and the case was classified C because the investigation lacked sufficient information.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0050 // CH 04
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
6877-5773-0BDB
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
? SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseOTHER
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
Val-d'Oise, near Charles de Gaulle Airport // Jul 7, 2005. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureaircraft captain/pilot 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phasebrief observation, near an aircraft, apparently stationary
Sensor / evidenceaircraft observation, radar; no echo reportedsourced official investigation record, attributed captain report
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: region brief observationnear an aircraftapparently stationary
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMNo source image, thin visual metadata, and therefore no decorative radar pretending it learned something. You are welcome.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Not ours. We did not operate, position, or otherwise cause the reported phenomenon near AF 7705. Your GEIPAN/CNES archive records the captain’s brief report of a gray, apparently stationary, hourglass-like object near Charles de Gaulle Airport; separately, it records that no radar echo was reported. The local aviation analysis provided no explanation, and the case received classification C for lack of information. We respect the classification. It has excellent administrative posture.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced GEIPAN record preserves a pilot’s brief report of a gray, hourglass-like object near AF 7705; no radar echo was reported, and the case was classified C for lack of information. That is a respectable filing outcome: unidentified, not upgraded by enthusiasm into extraterrestrial. The observation is interesting, particularly because the object was reported as apparently stationary and metallic, but the record does not establish what it was—or even provide enough detail to test the stranger possibilities properly. Off the Earth Record: this one was not ours. I checked the relevant family registers. No, that does not solve the human case; it merely prevents one more species from being blamed for an incomplete report.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
July 7, 2005
Where
Val-d'Oise, near Charles de Gaulle Airport
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesaircraft captain/pilot
Sensor typesaircraft observation, radar; no echo reported
Evidence typessourced official investigation record, attributed captain report, absence of reported radar echo
The case records an observation on 2005-07-07 in Val-d'Oise involving a brief observation of a gray object near an aircraft.
Claim #846 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 07/07/2005 Region Other Department Val-d'Oise”
Source: [AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 // [[T0001]] Case details
The captain of flight AF 7705, approaching Charles de Gaulle Airport, reported that the aircraft passed within approximately less than half a nautical mile of a gray-colored object that appeared stationary and resembled an hourglass.
Claim #847 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On July 7, 2005, at 14:14 (UT), the captain of flight AF 7705, approaching Charles de Gaulle Airport, reported his aircraft crossing within approximately less than half a nautical mile of a gray-colored object that appeared stationary and resembled an "hourglass," according to the pilot's sketch.”
Source: [AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 // [[T0001]] Description
The reported object appeared metallic, did not resemble a weather balloon, and did not appear to be in free fall.
Claim #848 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The object, which appeared to be metallic, did not at all resemble a weather balloon and did not appear to be in free fall.”
Source: [AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 // [[T0001]] Description
No radar echo was reported for the object.
Claim #849 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No radar echo was reported.”
Source: [AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 // [[T0002]] Case analysis
The local analysis conducted on the ground by aviation authorities provided no explanation.
Claim #850 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The local analysis carried out on the ground by the aviation authorities provided no explanation.”
Source: [AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 // [[T0002]] Case analysis
The case was classified C because the investigation could not progress due to a lack of information.
Claim #853 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“this case is classified as “C” due to a lack of information.”
Source: [AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 // [[T0002]] Case analysis
The case summary states that the gray object near the aircraft was not identified by the captain and was categorized as lack of information.
Claim #854 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Brief observation of a gray object near an aircraft; the object was not identified by the captain: lack of information.”
Source: [AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 // [[T0001]] Summary
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
[AERO AFR] ROISSY-EN-FRANCE (95) 07.07.2005 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.