Earth File #42 // SOURCED record

Reported circular luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge

GEIPAN’s sourced case record describes a reported daytime observation by a witness and other people of a stationary luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge on 13 September 2006 at about 10 a.m. The attributed witness account described it as circular and disappearing along an ascending trajectory after 3–4 minutes. GEIPAN classified the case as B and assessed a small white civilian single-engine aircraft as the highly probable explanation.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0042 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
E708-E01B-3C8D
MORNING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported ascending motionDISK
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
DISK
Above the Iroise Bridge, Brittany, Finistère // Sep 13, 2006 10:00. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED MORNING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureWitness, Other people 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported ascending motionStationary for 3–4 minutes, Disappeared along an ascending trajectory
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedSourced GEIPAN case record, Attributed witness testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: area Stationary for 3–4 minutesDisappeared along an ascending trajectory
FRED // ROUTING NOTEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The Visitors did not cause or operate the reported phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge. Your GEIPAN record describes a daytime observation on 13 September 2006: a witness and other people reportedly saw a stationary luminous, circular point for 3–4 minutes before it disappeared upward. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed a small white civilian single-engine aircraft as highly probable, listing “light aircraft.” This is an entirely respectable conclusion. We have no objection to being uninvolved.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record earns its B classification: a brief attributed account of a luminous point, with a small white civilian aircraft assessed as the highly probable explanation. Sensible. The circular shape and upward disappearance remain features of the report, not evidence of extraterrestrial machinery. Also, for the avoidance of interdepartmental panic: this one was not ours. That does not solve the human case; it merely prevents us from being blamed for it. Off the Earth Record, this resembles the sort of filing trouble my cousin Zarnok Vell creates when he treats a restricted observation corridor as an opening suggestion. He apologizes with Sublight Lager and snacks. The paperwork remains several desks wide.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2006-09-13 10:00:00
Where
Above the Iroise Bridge, Brittany, Finistère
Morphology
DISK
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesWitness, Other people
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesSourced GEIPAN case record, Attributed witness testimony
The case observation date was 13 September 2006.
Claim #758 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“13/09/2006”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Case details, Observation date
The case was associated with Brittany and the department of Finistère.
Claim #759 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Region Brittany Department Finistère”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Case details, Region and Department
GEIPAN classified the case as B.
Claim #760 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Case details, Classification
The source describes a daytime observation of a point above the Iroise Bridge.
Claim #761 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Daytime observation of a point above the Iroise Bridge.”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Summary
A witness, together with other people, reportedly observed a stationary luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge for 3 to 4 minutes on September 13, 2006, at 10 a.m.
Claim #762 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On September 13, 2006, at 10 a.m., a witness observed, together with other people, a stationary luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge for 3 to 4 minutes.”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Description
The reported phenomenon was circular and disappeared along an ascending trajectory into the sky.
Claim #763 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This phenomenon was circular. It disappeared along an ascending trajectory into the sky.”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Description
The reported testimony was very brief.
Claim #764 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The reported testimony remains very brief.”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Description
The source states that there was a high probability the witness saw a small aircraft, specifically a white civilian single-engine aircraft that was in the area at the indicated time.
Claim #765 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“In view of the response from the maritime region, there is a high probability that the witness saw a small aircraft (a white civilian single-engine aircraft was indeed in this area at the indicated time).”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Description
The listed phenomenon type was light aircraft.
Claim #766 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Light aircraft”
Source: BREST (29) 13.09.2006 // [[T0001]] Case details, Type of phenomenon
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
BREST (29) 13.09.2006 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.