Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesWitness report
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness testimony, Trajectory documents, Schematic representation
The case summary describes an observation of the passage of a large round object.
Claim #3490 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the passage of a large round object.”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Summary
The report was submitted on 2009-07-31 and concerned an older observation from September 1990 or 1991; the witness did not remember the exact date.
Claim #3491 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Recent report (31/07/2009) of an old observation (September 1990 or 1991; the witness no longer remembers the exact date).”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported seeing, at dusk, the slow movement of a large circular object measuring between 20 and 40 meters and emitting a regular rumbling sound.
Claim #3492 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“A witness states that, at dusk, they observed the slow movement of a large circular object (between 20 and 40 meters) that emitted a regular rumbling sound.”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported seeing lights flashing in various colors around the object's perimeter for 3 to 4 minutes.
Claim #3493 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“For 3 to 4 minutes, this person was able to see lights flashing in various colors around the object's perimeter.”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported that the object followed a straight northeast-to-southwest trajectory at an altitude between 100 and 200 meters.
Claim #3494 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“It followed a straight NE-SW trajectory at an altitude between 100 and 200 meters.”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported that the object disappeared without changing trajectory and blended into the sky.
Claim #3495 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The object disappeared without changing trajectory, blending into the sky.”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Description
The record states that the age of the observation made any investigation difficult, if not impossible.
Claim #3498 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The age of the observation makes any investigation difficult, if not impossible.”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0002]] Description
In a letter dated 2010-09-14, the witness specified the observation date as September 1991, without providing the day, and attached trajectory documents and a schematic representation of the observed object.
Claim #3499 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Following a new letter from the witness (dated September 14, 2010), they specified the observation date as September 1991 (with no details about the day) and attached documents concerning the trajectory taken by the object, along with a schematic representation they made of the observed object (see witness letter).”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0002]] Description
The case is classified as C.
Claim #3500 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
C”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case's phenomenon type is listed as lack of reliable information.
Claim #3501 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Lack of reliable information”
Source: CERGY (95) --.09.1991
// [[T0001]] Case details
