Earth File #272 // SOURCED record

Lusignan (86): reported flash and dome-shaped object

On 28 February 1993, a motorist traveling on the D150 between Saint-Sauvant and Lusignan reportedly observed a flash of white light and a dome-shaped object with three luminous circles near the ground at around 5:30–5:45 a.m. The reported observation lasted 3–4 seconds. GEIPAN classified the case B: Ground lights and assessed that it probably involved one or more brightly lit vehicles, such as an agricultural vehicle or hunter’s 4x4.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0272 // CH 12
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
F562-0B84-D2D5
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
? WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionOTHER
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
D150 between Saint-Sauvant and Lusignan // Feb 28, 1993. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureMotorist 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionFlash of white light, Observed for approximately 3–4 seconds, Reportedly at most 2 m above the ground as estimated from 300 m
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness report, Gendarmerie report
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: area Flash of white lightObserved for approximately 3–4 secondsReportedly at most 2 m above the ground as estimated from 300 m
FRED // QUICK TAKEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We acknowledge the Lusignan operation. The archive reports that a motorist on the D150 saw a white flash and a dome-shaped form with three luminous circles near the ground for roughly three to four seconds. Those features were ours; the timing was efficient, if not elegant. GEIPAN classified the case B: Ground lights and assessed that powerful vehicle lighting probably explained it. A reasonable terrestrial filing. Not the correct one, but reasonable.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A brief flash, a dome, three lights, and an official reexamination later: GEIPAN classified this one B—ground lights—and judged brightly lit vehicles the probable explanation. The observation was brief and made while driving, partly via a rear-view mirror, so the record quite reasonably declines to promote roadside illumination into interstellar transport. The Visitors are claiming this case. They are incorrect. Off the Earth Record, our internal files indicate no AlienBox involvement here. I have checked twice, because apparently even extraterrestrial departments now require rebutting claims filed by relatives who were not present. The human record supports a cautious, ordinary explanation; the cosmic ownership dispute is strictly Fred’s paperwork, not Earth evidence.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
February 28, 1993
Where
D150 between Saint-Sauvant and Lusignan
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesMotorist
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness report, Gendarmerie report, Official GEIPAN investigation, Official classification and assessment
The observation date was 28 February 1993.
Claim #3236 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 28/02/1993”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified B: Ground lights by GEIPAN.
Claim #3237 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as B: Ground lights.”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0003]] Case conclusion
The source describes a flash of white light and a dome-shaped object with three luminous circles near the ground.
Claim #3238 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a flash of white light and a dome-shaped object with 3 luminous circles near the ground: probable observation of ground lights that may have come from one or more vehicles with powerful lighting (agricultural vehicle, 4x4).”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0001]] Summary
A motorist traveling on the D150 between Saint-Sauvant and Lusignan reportedly observed the flash and object at around 5:30 or 5:45 a.m.; the observation lasted 3 to 4 seconds.
Claim #3239 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On 28 February 1993, at around 5:30 or 5:45 a.m., a motorist traveling on the D150 between SAINT-SAUVANT (86) and LUSIGNAN (86) observed, on her left, a very powerful flash of white light and saw a dome-shaped object with three luminous circles.”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0002]] Case description
The witness reported the observation to the gendarmerie the following evening.
Claim #3240 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The following evening, the witness went to the gendarmerie to report the facts.”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0002]] Case description
The source states that the described UAP was at most 2 m above the ground as estimated from 300 m, and that the 300 m distance was validated by mapping.
Claim #3241 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“The height above the ground of the UAP described by the witness was at most 2 m, as estimated by her from a distance of 300 m; this distance was validated by mapping, given the position of the woods in relation to the road (see the investigation notes).”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0002]] Investigation assessment
GEIPAN assessed that the observation probably involved one or more vehicles with powerful lighting, such as an agricultural vehicle or hunter’s 4x4.
Claim #3242 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Ultimately, this description indicates, with good probability, the presence of one or more vehicles with powerful lighting (agricultural vehicle, hunter’s 4x4, etc.), even at this early hour.”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0002]] Investigation assessment
The source says the witness observed under poor conditions while driving and partly through the rear-view mirror, which gave the testimony low consistency.
Claim #3243 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“It is noted that the witness made the observation under poor conditions, while driving and partly via the rear-view mirror; she did not stop to observe the characteristics of the UAP more precisely, particularly its movement.”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0003]] Testimony assessment
The case was formerly classified D by SEPRA and was later reexamined.
Claim #3244 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This observation case, formerly named LUSIGNAN (86) 1993, is one of the cases classified “D” by SEPRA and recently reexamined.”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0002]] Reexamination background
The source states that the witness’s visual perception was not at issue in the proposed vehicle hypothesis.
Claim #3245 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“It is not the witness’s visual perception that is at issue.”
Source: LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 // [[T0002]] Investigation assessment
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
LUSIGNAN (86) 28.02.1993 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.