Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesresident, children, several witnesses
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, air-traffic reconstruction, no photograph
The case is dated 14 September 2024, is located in Île-de-France's Yvelines department, and has classification A.
Claim #23154 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
14/09/2024
Region
Île-de-France
Department
Yvelines
Classification
A”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case summary describes a UAP passing in front of the Moon, shaped like a large cigar with a single white light at the front, and identifies it as an airliner.
Claim #23155 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a UAP passing in front of the Moon, shaped like a large “cigar” with a single white light at the front: observation of an airliner.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0001]] Summary
A resident of Emancé and his children were observing the Moon when they noticed unusual navigation lights.
Claim #23156 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On the evening of September 14, 2024, a resident of Emancé (78) and his children were observing the Moon when they noticed unusual navigation lights behind a small wooded area.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0001]] Description
Witness T1 identified a military helicopter, probably a Tiger, passing slightly above the Moon.
Claim #23157 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“T1 identified a military helicopter, probably a Tiger, passing slightly above the Moon.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0001]] Description
A second object followed a similar trajectory toward the Moon, with visible navigation lights and an elongated cigar-shaped silhouette with a white light at the front.
Claim #23158 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“A few minutes later, a second object followed a similar trajectory toward the Moon. The navigation lights were visible, and an elongated “cigar”-shaped silhouette appeared in the moonlight, with a white light at the front.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0001]] Description
The Moon crossing lasted 1 to 2 seconds and had no perceptible sound.
Claim #23159 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“seconds, with no perceptible sound.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
GEIPAN states that the case has low strangeness and good consistency, with several witnesses, a single fairly complete testimony, and no photograph of the UAP.
Claim #23160 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“With low strangeness and consistency* deemed good (several witnesses, a single but fairly complete testimony, no photograph of the UAP), this case turns out to be an observation of an airliner (see the investigation report).”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
GEIPAN states that the UAP's navigation lights very strongly suggest an aircraft.
Claim #23161 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The description of the UAP very strongly suggests an aircraft, since the UAP was equipped with navigation lights.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Explanation
A reconstruction of air traffic could not locate the helicopter described by T1 but identified the UAP as an A321 operated by Vueling, flight VLG43PQ.
Claim #23162 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A reconstruction of air traffic was unable to locate the helicopter described by T1, but it identified the UAP as an A321 operated by the Vueling airline (flight VLG43PQ), whose trajectory and passage time correspond to those of the UAP.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Explanation
The reconstructed apparent trajectory showed that the identified aircraft passed in front of the Moon.
Claim #23163 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A reconstruction of its apparent trajectory shows that it did indeed pass in front of the Moon.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Explanation
The case is classified A as an observation of an airliner.
Claim #23164 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is classified “A,” observation of an airliner.”
Source: EMANCE (78) 14.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Explanation