Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesT1, T1's wife
Sensor typesradar
Evidence typeswitness report, Technical Questionnaire, radar traces
The observation occurred on September 15, 2024, in the Limousin region and Haute-Vienne department, and the case was classified A.
Claim #23133 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
15/09/2024
Region
Limousin
Department
Haute-Vienne
Classification
A”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0001]] Case details
At approximately 10:45 p.m., witness T1 and his wife observed a black circular shape vertically above their position, moving southwest; it remained stationary for several minutes and emitted a flashing white light for a few seconds.
Claim #23134 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On September 15, 2024, at around 10:45 p.m., witness T1, together with his wife, observed from the terrace of their house a black circular shape vertically above their position and moving toward the southwest.”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0001]] Description
The estimated duration of the observation was approximately five minutes.
Claim #23135 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“estimated at approximately 5 minutes.”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Description
Only witness T1 submitted a completed Technical Questionnaire to GEIPAN, on September 16, 2024.
Claim #23136 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Only witness T1 submitted a completed Technical Questionnaire (TQ) to GEIPAN, on September 16, 2024.”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Description
On October 4, 2024, GEIPAN requested information from CAPCODA, and the radar traces were transmitted on October 11, 2024.
Claim #23137 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On October 4, 2024, GEIPAN made a request to the Air Center for Planning and Conduct of Air Defense Operations (CAPCODA) of the Air and Space Force. The radar traces were transmitted to us on October 11, 2024.”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Description
The radar traces showed a gas balloon flying over the witness between 10:43 p.m. and 10:49 p.m. local time, on a northeast-to-southwest trajectory at an altitude of 4,100 feet (1,200 m).
Claim #23138 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“They show the presence of a gas balloon flying over the witness between 10:43 p.m. and 10:49 p.m. local time (between 8:43 p.m. and 8:49 p.m. UTC), on a straight-line trajectory from northeast to southwest, at an altitude of 4,100 feet (1,200 m) (see Annex 1).”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Radar analysis
The balloon was identified as a Roland JBG-1050 type.
Claim #23139 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The balloon was a Roland JBG-1050 type (see Annex 2).”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Radar analysis
The balloon was participating in the Gordon Bennett Cup gas-balloon race, which flew over France from northeast to southwest and over Haute-Vienne on September 15, 2024.
Claim #23140 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“It was part of a gas-balloon race, the “Gordon Bennett Cup,” which flew over France from northeast to southwest and specifically over Haute-Vienne on Monday, September 15, 2024”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Radar analysis
GEIPAN assessed the case's consistency as good, based on a single witness and a detailed description of the UAP and its trajectory, without photo or video evidence.
Claim #23141 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The consistency* of the case is good, with an observation by a single witness, but a detailed description of the UAP and its trajectory, without a photo or video.”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Case assessment
GEIPAN stated that the shape, trajectory, and timing of the observation corresponded perfectly to the gas balloon flying over the witness's house.
Claim #23142 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The description of the observation—in terms of both the shape, trajectory, and time of passage—corresponds perfectly to this gas balloon flying over the witness’s house.”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Case assessment
The case was classified A as an observation of an inhabited gas balloon.
Claim #23143 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is classified “A”: observation of an inhabited gas balloon.”
Source: RILHAC-RANCON (87) 15.09.2024
// [[T0002]] Case assessment