Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
The case page gives the observation date as March 26, 2025.
Claim #22815 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
26/03/2025”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified as category A.
Claim #22816 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0001]] Case details
The observation involved a white light moving in a straight line across the sky and was identified in the summary as the ISS.
Claim #22817 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the straight-line passage of a white light across the sky: observation of the ISS (International Space Station).”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0001]] Testimonies — Summary
The observation occurred on March 26, 2025, between 8:15 p.m. and 8:20 p.m. local time, while a witness was walking home in Veyrier, Switzerland.
Claim #22818 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On March 26, 2025, between 8:15 p.m. and 8:20 p.m. (local time), a witness is walking home in the municipality of Veyrier, in the canton of Geneva (Switzerland).”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0001]] Testimonies — Description
The witness reported a highly luminous white light with no perceptible chromatic variation, moving rapidly in a straight line without apparent changes in trajectory or speed.
Claim #22819 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The phenomenon is characterized by a uniform white tint, with no perceptible chromatic variation, and an intensity clearly greater than that of the stars visible at that time.”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0001]] Testimonies — Description
The observation lasted less than ten seconds and was made outdoors with the naked eye without visual obstruction.
Claim #22820 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observation, made with the naked eye outdoors and without visual obstruction, lasts less than ten seconds.”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0001]] Testimonies — Description
The Technical Questionnaire indicated that the observation began northwest at an estimated elevation of 60 degrees and ended toward the southeast, where the light disappeared above Mont Salève.
Claim #22821 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Information from the Technical Questionnaire indicates that the observation began in a northwesterly direction, with an estimated elevation of 60°, and ended toward the southeast, marked by the disappearance of the light above Mont Salève.”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0002]] Testimonies — Description
COSE's astronautical analysis identified the passage of the ISS during the relevant time window, with azimuths and elevations consistent with the description.
Claim #22826 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Astronautical analysis transmitted by COSE to CNES highlights the passage of the International Space Station (ISS) during the time window in question, between 19:16 and 19:20 UTC, with azimuths and elevations consistent with the description.”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0003]] Testimonies — Description
The reported ISS trajectory extended from northwest to southeast, with elevation ranging from 10 degrees to a maximum of 86 degrees.
Claim #22827 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The ISS trajectory extends from the northwest (azimuth 296°) to the southeast (azimuth 140°), with an elevation ranging from 10° to a maximum of 86° (see appendix 3).”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0003]] Testimonies — Description
GEIPAN assessed the case as having average consistency because the questionnaire was precise but there was only one witness and no photo or video.
Claim #22828 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is considered to have average consistency: the information submitted in the Technical Questionnaire is precise, but only one witness is recorded and no image (photo or video) was provided.”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0003]] Testimonies — Description
GEIPAN states that the observed characteristics fully correspond to the passage of the ISS.
Claim #22829 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The characteristics observed—intense brightness, rapid and regular movement, and matching direction and time—fully correspond to the passage of the ISS.”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0003]] Testimonies — Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as category A and identifies it as an observation of the International Space Station.
Claim #22830 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies the case as “A”: observation of the ISS (International Space Station).”
Source: VEYRIER (GENEVE.CH) 26.03.2025
// [[T0003]] Testimonies — Description
