Earth File #2214 // SOURCED record

Reported pilot observation near Faverges, 2 October 1954

GEIPAN records a pilot's reported observation of an aircraft-like object near Faverges at 16:20 on 2 October 1954. The pilot described a disk inclined 30–40 degrees, with a phosphorescent rear-edge glow, moving along an ascending curve and disappearing on the horizon after about 70 seconds. GEIPAN classified the case C because of insufficient information and corroboration; a reflection from a nearby small object or the aircraft canopy could not be ruled out.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2214 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
832A-5C71-0E4F
DAYLIGHT
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported ascending motionDISK
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
DISK
near Faverges // Oct 2, 1954 16:20. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA DAYLIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturePilot 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported ascending motionMoved on the same heading as the aircraft, Followed an ascending curve, Disappeared on the horizon after approximately 70 seconds
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedPilot report, Single-witness testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Moved on the same heading as the aircraftFollowed an ascending curveDisappeared on the horizon after approximately 70 seconds
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, that was ours. The research record reports that a pilot near Faverges described a disk inclined 30–40 degrees, with a phosphorescent rear edge, following an ascending curve before disappearing on the horizon after about 70 seconds. GEIPAN classified the case C because information and corroboration were insufficient, noting that a reflection from a nearby small object or the aircraft canopy could not be ruled out. Correct. Our equipment was present; your paperwork remains unconvinced.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
This is a SOURCED Earth Record, but GEIPAN’s classification C is doing important work: one pilot’s report remains a report, not a vehicle registration. The description is precise enough to be interesting and the documentation too thin to settle whether the glow belonged to an object, a canopy reflection, or something else. Sensible conclusion, irritatingly unfashionable. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, we finally noticed us. Brikk Tor, a Dremulan family friend, took responsibility after organizing a three-cousin plan to replace a borrowed component before anyone noticed. It would have worked better if they had remembered which component they borrowed. He maintains the landing was technically controlled. He also said this while drinking Ionberry Ale, so Gorkon filed the statement under “responsibility, with reservations.”
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
1954-10-02 16:20:00
Where
near Faverges
Morphology
DISK
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the witness context includes aviation personnel and the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 10 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Pilot Report and Single Witness Testimony.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C; a reflection of sunlight from a nearby small object or the aircraft canopy could not be ruled out..

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesPilot
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesPilot report, Single-witness testimony
The case concerns a distant observation by a pilot of the movement of a circular object.
Claim #22548 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Distant observation by a pilot of the movement of a circular object: lack of information.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0001]] Summary
On 2 October 1954, an experienced pilot with approximately 10,000 flight hours and specializing in Alpine flights was flying a Nord 1203 at 220 km/h and 2,000 metres on a heading of 250 degrees.
Claim #22549 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On October 2, 1954, an experienced pilot (approximately 10,000 flight hours, specializing in flights in the Alps), at the controls of a Nord 1203, is flying on a heading of 250°, at 220 km/h and at an altitude of 2,000 m.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0001]] Description
At 4:20 p.m., the pilot observed on his right an aircraft-like object moving on the same heading at an approximate altitude of 4,000 metres and distance of 10 kilometres, following an ascending curve.
Claim #22550 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“At 4:20 p.m. he observes on his right an “aircraft” moving on the same heading at an altitude of approximately 4,000 m, located at a distance he estimates at approximately 10 km. Its trajectory follows an ascending curve.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0001]] Description
The pilot described the object as a disk inclined 30–40 degrees on its axis, with a phosphorescent glow on its rear edge and an estimated diameter of 3–4 metres.
Claim #22551 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“Its shape is that of a disk inclined on its axis by 30 to 40°, whose rear edge shows a phosphorescent glow. Its diameter is estimated at 3–4 m.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0001]] Description
The object disappeared on the horizon after 70 seconds.
Claim #22552 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“It disappears on the horizon after 70 s.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0001]] Description
The pilot made a brief report, and no other testimony was collected.
Claim #22553 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“pilot makes a brief report of his observation. No other testimony is collected.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0002]] Description
The source states that a reflection of sunlight on a much closer small object, such as a balloon, or on the aircraft canopy cannot be ruled out.
Claim #22554 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“a reflection of sunlight on a much closer small object (a balloon), or even a reflection of sunlight on the canopy, cannot be ruled out.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as C because of a lack of information and corroboration.
Claim #22555 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as C due to a lack of information and corroboration.”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0002]] Description
The case's phenomenon type is listed as lack of reliable information.
Claim #22556 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Lack of reliable information”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source reports no astronomical misidentification identified in the relevant area.
Claim #22557 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 94% extraction confidence
“no astronomical misidentification identified in this area; see sky map”
Source: [AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 // [[T0002]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
[AERO MIL] FAVERGES (74) 02.10.1954 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.