Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesTwo people in a moving car
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesVisual observation through a windshield, Single testimony submitted by email
The case observation date was 2009-02-05.
Claim #21073 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
05/02/2009”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified as C.
Claim #21074 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
C”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type was listed as lack of reliable information.
Claim #21075 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Lack of reliable information”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Case details
The archive summary describes observations of three very slowly moving blue, white, and red lights, with each color forming a triangle.
Claim #21076 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Observations of the very slow movement of three blue, white, and red lights, with each color forming a triangle: lack of information.”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Summary
According to the case description, two people in a car observed three blue, white, and red lights forming a triangle at a height of 30 or 40 meters and moving slowly.
Claim #21077 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“On February 5, 2009, at around 7:00 p.m., two people in a car observed above the four-lane road three blue, white, and red lights forming a triangle, floating at a height of 30 or 40 m and moving slowly.”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN received a single testimony by email.
Claim #21078 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN received a single testimony by email.”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Description
The observation was made through the windshield of a moving car.
Claim #21079 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The observation was made through the windshield of a moving car.”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Description
The weather conditions described as pouring rain did not allow the hypothesis of reflections to be ruled out.
Claim #21080 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The weather conditions—“it was pouring with rain”—do not make it possible to rule out the hypothesis of “reflections.””
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness did not respond to GEIPAN’s requests for additional information, particularly an official report.
Claim #21081 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness did not respond to GEIPAN’s requests for additional information (particularly an official report).”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0001]] Description
The source states that further investigation was impossible because of lack of information.
Claim #21082 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“impossible: lack of information.”
Source: SAINT-NAZAIRE (44) 05.02.2009
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
