Earth File #1984 // SOURCED record

Reported red luminous point observation in Fontainebleau forest

A walker reported observing a moving red luminous point in the Fontainebleau forest on August 22, 2009, at around 10:15 p.m. The observation reportedly lasted approximately six minutes before the object disappeared. GEIPAN classified the case C because insufficient information was available for investigation.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1984 // CH 09
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
CAD3-89E9-1FA8
NIGHT
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Fontainebleau forest, Île-de-France, Seine-et-Marne // Aug 22, 2009 22:15. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewalker 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoved, disappeared
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness report, official GEIPAN record
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: area moveddisappeared
FRED // FAMILY MATTERShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We were present in the Fontainebleau forest on 22 August 2009, but only as observers. The reported red luminous point was not ours, and we did not cause it. Your archive records that a walker reported seeing it at around 10:15 p.m.; the witness reportedly observed movement before disappearance, with the observation lasting approximately six minutes. GEIPAN classified the case C because insufficient information was available for investigation. An admirably efficient filing decision, if not an explanation.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s record is admirably plain: a walker reported a red luminous point, and the case is classified C because the information was insufficient for investigation. That is not a coded admission of a spacecraft; it is simply an underfilled folder. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors were observers only—not the cause, and certainly not an identification of what was seen. Family note: this reminds me of Mivra Qel, an Orinthian who once borrowed a survey skiff for “one quick pass,” ignored every restricted corridor, and returned it with atmospheric dust in the intake plus three Sublight Lagers I had not authorized. Different paperwork, same professional standard. Keep this one unresolved.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2009-08-22 22:15:00
Where
Fontainebleau forest, Île-de-France, Seine-et-Marne
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report and Official GEIPAN Record.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Insufficient information for investigation; GEIPAN classification C.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #2325

Cavaillon (84): red luminous points reported on the horizon

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2306

FLEURY (11): two luminous points reported above the horizon

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2112

Reported luminous phenomenon at La Graverie, 21 May 2008

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2044

Reported luminous phenomenon observation near Taurignan-Vieux

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2040

Reported Toulouse observation of a rapidly moving white light

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2038

Chartrettes (77): reported stationary multicolored luminous object

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswalker
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness report, official GEIPAN record
The case observation date was 2009-08-22.
Claim #20295 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation date 22/08/2009”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is associated with the Île-de-France region and the Seine-et-Marne department.
Claim #20296 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Region Île-de-France Department Seine-et-Marne”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified C.
Claim #20297 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The recorded phenomenon type is lack of reliable information.
Claim #20298 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Lack of reliable information”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
A walker in the Fontainebleau forest reported observing a red luminous point on August 22, 2009, at around 10:15 p.m., at 30° above the horizon.
Claim #20299 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A walker in the Fontainebleau forest reported observing, on August 22, 2009, at around 10:15 p.m., a red luminous point at 30° above the horizon.”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness observed the object's movement before it disappeared.
Claim #20300 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness then observed the object's movement before it disappeared.”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted approximately six minutes.
Claim #20301 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted approximately 6 minutes.”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness did not provide sufficient information for GEIPAN to conduct an investigation.
Claim #20303 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“therefore did not provide sufficient information to enable GEIPAN to conduct an investigation.”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The case was classified C due to a lack of information.
Claim #20304 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“This case is classified as C due to a lack of information.”
Source: FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
FONTAINEBLEAU (77) 22.08.2009 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod