Earth File #198 // SOURCED record

Réunion bright point with white trail observation

On March 1, 1996, at around 7:30 p.m., four witnesses in Réunion observed a very bright point in the sky with a white trail. The phenomenon was silent and lasted between 1 and 3 minutes. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as likely atmospheric reentry of a meteorite or space debris.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0198 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
B4AE-0938-8B26
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // CLASSIFICATION DISPUTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Réunion // Mar 1, 1996 19:30. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturefour witnesses 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionsilent, lasted between 1 and 3 minutes
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type stateddirect witness observation, official GEIPAN case assessment
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: region silentlasted between 1 and 3 minutes
FRED // CLASSIFICATION DISPUTEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Ours. On 1 March 1996, we crossed the Réunion sky as a very bright point with a white trail. Four witnesses saw it; the phenomenon remained silent for between one and three minutes. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as likely atmospheric reentry of a meteorite or space debris. Their assessment is reasonable, by Earth standards. We filed the transit under “routine,” then misplaced the form at Gorkon Outpost.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A bright, silent trail observed by four people in Réunion on March 1, 1996: GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as likely atmospheric reentry of a meteorite or space debris. Sensible filing. The Earth Record establishes an observation and an official assessment—not an extraterrestrial conclusion, despite the tempting lighting effects. Off the Earth Record, however: yes, yes. Ours. A routine atmospheric demonstration, badly labeled and submitted without the required cross-departmental notice. I have already sent the responsible relatives a reminder about forms, timing, and not making Earth archives do our inventory work for us.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
1996-03-01 19:30:00
Where
Réunion
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesfour witnesses
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesdirect witness observation, official GEIPAN case assessment
The observation date for the case is 1996-03-01.
Claim #2406 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“01/03/1996”
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Case details, Date of observation
The case concerns the overseas department of Réunion.
Claim #2407 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Overseas Department Réunion”
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Case details, Region and Department
The case is classified B.
Claim #2408 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Case details, Classification
The archive describes the phenomenon type as an identified phenomenon not specified.
Claim #2409 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Identified phenomenon not specified”
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Case details, Phenomenon type
On March 1, 1996, at around 7:30 p.m., four witnesses observed a very bright point in the sky with a white trail.
Claim #2410 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On March 1, 1996, at around 7:30 p.m., 4 witnesses observed the movement of a very bright point in the sky with a white trail, making the whole thing resemble a “neon tube.””
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Summary and Description
The phenomenon was silent and lasted between 1 and 3 minutes.
Claim #2411 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The phenomenon was silent and lasted between 1 and 3 minutes.”
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN assesses the observation as likely atmospheric reentry of a meteorite or space debris.
Claim #2412 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“In all likelihood, it was the atmospheric reentry of a meteorite or space debris.”
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Description
The case summary characterizes the observation as a likely atmospheric reentry.
Claim #2413 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“Likely observation of an atmospheric reentry”
Source: REUNION (974) 1996 // [[T0001]] Summary
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
REUNION (974) 1996 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.