Earth File #1819 // SOURCED record

Reported Orange Ball on the D940, Classified as Venus

On 13 February 2011 at 6:07 a.m., a motorist traveling between Lamarque-Pontarcq and Lourdes reported a slow-moving orange ball just above the horizon. The observation lasted approximately thirty minutes. GEIPAN classified the phenomenon as Venus and attributed the reported color changes and apparent details to atmospheric scintillation.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1819 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
03BC-661C-B55C
MORNING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionSPHERE
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
D940 between Lamarque-Pontarcq and Lourdes // Feb 13, 2011 06:07. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED MORNING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturemotorist, single testimony 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoving slowly
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness report, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: area moving slowly
FRED // ROUTING NOTEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We confirm responsibility for the reported phenomenon. The Earth Record, through the GEIPAN/CNES archive, describes a motorist observing a slow-moving orange ball above the horizon on 13 February 2011, for approximately thirty minutes. GEIPAN classified the observation as Venus and attributed the reported color changes and details to atmospheric scintillation. This is a reasonable terrestrial filing. It is not, however, the complete operational account. Our paperwork remains regrettably brighter than the object.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The Earth Record is admirably unromantic: GEIPAN classified the reported orange light as Venus, with horizon scintillation accounting for the changing colors and apparent details. A single testimony, no sensors, and a bright planet in the reported direction make that a tidy filing outcome—not a failure of imagination. Off the Earth Record, yes, that was ours. Mivra Qel, an Orinthian with a dangerous relationship to restricted corridors, made one extra low-orbit pass to inspect the lights. She later discovered why “one extra pass” appears in so many incident reports. I received the form, the apology, and half a bottle of Ionberry Ale. The Venus classification remains sound. My family’s parking judgment does not.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2011-02-13 06:07:00
Where
D940 between Lamarque-Pontarcq and Lourdes
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report, Official Scientific Investigation, and Astronomical Check.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Venus, with reported color and detail changes attributed to atmospheric scintillation.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesmotorist, single testimony
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness report, official scientific investigation, astronomical check
The case observation date was 13 February 2011.
Claim #18746 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On Sunday, February 13, 2011, at 6:07 a.m., a motorist on the D940 between Lamarque-Pontarcq (65) and Lourdes (65) was intrigued by the slow movement of an orange ball just above the horizon.”
Source: [D940] FROM LAMARQUE-PONTACQ (65) TO LOURDES (65) 13.02.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
At 6:07 a.m., a motorist on the D940 between Lamarque-Pontarcq and Lourdes reported a slow-moving orange ball just above the horizon.
Claim #18747 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On Sunday, February 13, 2011, at 6:07 a.m., a motorist on the D940 between Lamarque-Pontarcq (65) and Lourdes (65) was intrigued by the slow movement of an orange ball just above the horizon.”
Source: [D940] FROM LAMARQUE-PONTACQ (65) TO LOURDES (65) 13.02.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted approximately thirty minutes and a single testimony was collected.
Claim #18748 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted approximately thirty minutes in total. A single testimony was collected.”
Source: [D940] FROM LAMARQUE-PONTACQ (65) TO LOURDES (65) 13.02.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
The observed phenomenon was listed as Venus.
Claim #18749 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Venus”
Source: [D940] FROM LAMARQUE-PONTACQ (65) TO LOURDES (65) 13.02.2011 // [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN classified the case as “A,” meaning an observation of the planet Venus.
Claim #18750 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as “A”: observation of the planet Venus.”
Source: [D940] FROM LAMARQUE-PONTACQ (65) TO LOURDES (65) 13.02.2011 // [[T0002]] Description
The observed direction was approximately 130° azimuth, and an astronomical check found that Venus was visible and extremely bright in that direction.
Claim #18751 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“An astronomical check shows that the planet Venus is visible in this direction and is extremely bright.”
Source: [D940] FROM LAMARQUE-PONTACQ (65) TO LOURDES (65) 13.02.2011 // [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN states that the reported color changes and details resulted from atmospheric scintillation, which is strong and variable just above the horizon.
Claim #18752 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The reported changes in color and details are the result of scintillation caused by the atmosphere; these effects are very strong and variable just above the horizon (the same applies at sunset).”
Source: [D940] FROM LAMARQUE-PONTACQ (65) TO LOURDES (65) 13.02.2011 // [[T0002]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.