Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness
Sensor typesvideo recording
Evidence typeswitness report, video analysis
The case record describes an observation in Lyon on June 28, 2013, at 10:58 p.m., involving luminous phenomena moving in straight lines above buildings; it reports three orange points forming one triangle, three more forming a larger triangle, and finally a single point.
Claim #16627 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On June 28, 2013, at 10:58 p.m., a witness observed luminous phenomena moving in straight lines above the Lyon buildings: three orange luminous points forming a first triangle were followed by three other orange-colored points also forming a larger triangle.”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0001]]
The source reports that no particular sound was heard and that the intermittent observation lasted several minutes, with the points disappearing behind the urban landscape.
Claim #16628 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No particular sound was heard during the intermittent observation, which lasted several minutes.”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0001]]
The witness observed and filmed two passages of orange luminous points flying in formation.
Claim #16629 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness observed and filmed two passages of orange luminous points flying in formation.”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0001]]
The case record says that the witness indicated movement from west to east, while map and video analysis showed movement from north to south or north-northwest to south-southeast.
Claim #16630 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness indicated movement from west to east, but an analysis of the map of the area and the video shows movement from north to south, or north-northwest to south-southeast.”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0002]]
The source states that the analyzed movement was compatible with objects carried by the wind and cites a northerly wind recorded at Bron.
Claim #16631 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“The objects therefore came from the north, which is compatible with objects carried by the wind (a northerly wind recorded at Bron according to Meteociel).”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0002]]
The characteristics of the observed objects led the case analysis toward the hypothesis that Thai lanterns passed by.
Claim #16632 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The characteristics of the observed objects—orange balls moving with the wind—point toward the hypothesis that Thai lanterns passed by.”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0002]]
The source states that a stable triangular formation is common when lanterns are released in groups of three and that equal spacing can result from stable wind conditions.
Claim #16633 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“A stable triangular formation is common when releasing lanterns in groups of three; it is entirely normal for the three lanterns to remain at equal distances if the wind is stable (which is not always the case).”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0002]]
The case is classified B as a probable observation of Thai lanterns.
Claim #16635 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified "B": probable observation of Thai lanterns.”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0002]]
The case page lists the phenomenon type as Thai lantern.
Claim #16636 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon
Thai lantern”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0001]]
The case page lists the classification as B.
Claim #16637 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
B”
Source: LYON (69) 28.06.2013
// [[T0001]]
