Earth File #1550 // SOURCED record

Condat-sur-Ganaveix white luminous phenomenon observation

GEIPAN records that on 2 March 2014, between 6:30 p.m. and 7 p.m., a witness observed a slowly moving white luminous phenomenon above housing-development rooftops while closing shutters. The witness photographed it for about thirty minutes before it was hidden by trees. GEIPAN determined that the photographed luminous rectangles were reflections from a Minolta camera flash through a glass door and classified the case A: photographic reflection.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1550 // CH 07
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
77E4-9AED-8F86
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Condat-sur-Ganaveix // Mar 2, 2014. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoving slowly, observed above rooftops, hidden by trees
Sensor / evidencecamera, photographswitness report, photographs
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)6 structured claim(s) location precision: locality moving slowlyobserved above rooftopshidden by trees
FRED // FAMILY MATTERAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We accept responsibility for the reported visitor presence above Condat-sur-Ganaveix on 2 March 2014. Your record says a witness observed a slowly moving white luminous phenomenon, photographed it, and lost sight of it behind trees. GEIPAN classified the case A, identifying the photographed rectangles as reflections from a Minolta flash through glass. This does not alter our claim. It merely demonstrates that human paperwork can file two mysteries in one folder.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record classifies this as A: a photographic reflection—the luminous rectangles were reflections of a Minolta flash seen through glass. Sensible result. The observation may have felt airborne and mysterious, but the photographs gave the filing office something considerably less glamorous than a visitor: optics doing their job. Off the Earth Record, however: yes, yes, you finally noticed us. Brikk Tor, my Dremulan family friend, borrowed a survey skiff for “one quick pass,” returned it with atmospheric dust in the intake and three Nebula Cherry Fizz drinks I never authorized, and still insists the landing was technically controlled. Naturally, he has submitted a responsibility claim. I have filed it under Reflections and Poor Judgment.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
March 2, 2014
Where
Condat-sur-Ganaveix
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 2 sensor types, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 6 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Camera and Photographs.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report and Photographs.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Photographic reflection from the rectangular flash of a Minolta camera, seen through a glass door.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness
Sensor typescamera, photographs
Evidence typeswitness report, photographs
The case's observation date is 2 March 2014.
Claim #16308 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation date 02/03/2014”
Source: CONDAT-SUR-GANAVEIX (19) 02.03.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
On 2 March 2014 between 6:30 p.m. and 7 p.m., a witness observed a white luminous phenomenon moving slowly above the roofs of houses in a housing development while closing the shutters.
Claim #16309 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“On 2 March 2014 between 6:30 p.m. and 7 p.m., a witness, while closing the shutters, observed a white luminous phenomenon moving slowly above the roofs of the houses in the housing development.”
Source: CONDAT-SUR-GANAVEIX (19) 02.03.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness took photographs before the phenomenon was hidden by trees, and the observation lasted about thirty minutes.
Claim #16310 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“The witness took photographs before the phenomenon was hidden by trees. The observation lasted about thirty minutes.”
Source: CONDAT-SUR-GANAVEIX (19) 02.03.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The case page lists the phenomenon type as Reflections and the classification as A.
Claim #16311 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification A Update date 23/06/2021 Type of phenomenon Reflections”
Source: CONDAT-SUR-GANAVEIX (19) 02.03.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN states that the witness's photographs show framing through a glass door and luminous rectangles made up of reflections from the rectangular flash of the Minolta camera used.
Claim #16312 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“However, the witness's photographs showing these lights reveal framing through a glass door and luminous rectangles made up of reflections from the rectangular flash of the Minolta camera used.”
Source: CONDAT-SUR-GANAVEIX (19) 02.03.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN concludes only on what is described and classifies the strangeness experienced by the witness as A: photographic reflection.
Claim #16313 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Consequently, GEIPAN concludes only on what is described and classifies the strangeness experienced by the witness as A: photographic reflection.”
Source: CONDAT-SUR-GANAVEIX (19) 02.03.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
CONDAT-SUR-GANAVEIX (19) 02.03.2014 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.