Earth File #1479 // SOURCED record

Reported observation of three luminous points near Gahard

A witness reportedly observed one luminous point followed two seconds later by two other luminous points. The three points reportedly traveled at the same speed and in the same direction for 15–20 seconds before disappearing against the Moon’s brightness. GEIPAN classified the case A and identified the observation as the Yaogan 20A, B, and C satellite triplet.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1479 // CH 02
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
A3EE-EDAB-D50A
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENT // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Gahard, Ille-et-Vilaine, Brittany // Jul 1, 2015. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureWitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionTraveled at the same speed, Traveled in the same direction, Disappeared because of the Moon's brightness
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness report, Official scientific UAP investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Traveled at the same speedTraveled in the same directionDisappeared because of the Moon's brightness
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENTAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Not ours. We did not operate the reported lights near Gahard, Brittany, on 1 July 2015, and accept no responsibility for their scheduling, luminosity, or administrative inconvenience. The GEIPAN record says a witness reported one luminous point followed two seconds later by two others, moving at the same speed and direction for 15–20 seconds before the Moon’s brightness obscured them. GEIPAN classified the case A and assessed the observation as the Yaogan 20A, B, and C satellite triplet. An earthly filing, for once, appears sufficient.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A clean one, by the standards of this desk: GEIPAN classified the case A and identified the reported three lights as the Yaogan 20A, B, and C satellite triplet. The matching timing, direction, speed, and disappearance against the Moon’s brightness make “unidentified” a temporary filing label, not a destination. Off the Earth Record: this was not ours. That does not solve the human case; it merely prevents our department from receiving credit—or blame—for every orderly object crossing a sky. I have submitted the correction to Gorkon Outpost, where it will be duplicated, misrouted, and eventually stamped “pending.” Progress.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
July 1, 2015
Where
Gahard, Ille-et-Vilaine, Brittany
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report and Official Scientific UAP Investigation.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Misidentification of the Yaogan 20A, 20B, and 20C Chinese military satellite triplet.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesWitness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness report, Official scientific UAP investigation
The observation date was 2015-07-01.
Claim #15675 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“01/07/2015”
Source: GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 // [[T0001]] Case details, Date of observation
The case is associated with Brittany and the Ille-et-Vilaine department.
Claim #15676 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Brittany Department Ille-et-Vilaine”
Source: GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 // [[T0001]] Case details
A witness observed one luminous point, followed two seconds later by two other luminous points; the three points traveled at the same speed and in the same direction.
Claim #15677 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On July 1, 2015, between midnight and 12:15 a.m., a witness observed the passage of a luminous point in a clear sky. Two seconds later, the witness again observed the passage of two other luminous points. The three points followed one another at the same speed and moved strictly in the same direction.”
Source: GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted between 15 and 20 seconds, and the points disappeared because of the Moon's brightness.
Claim #15678 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The points disappeared because of the Moon's brightness. The observation lasted between 15 and 20 seconds.”
Source: GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 // [[T0001]] Description
The case was determined to be a misidentification involving the Chinese military satellites Yaogan 20A, B, and C.
Claim #15679 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“this case turned out to be a misidentification involving a particular satellite triplet: the Chinese military satellites Yaogan 20A, B, and C.”
Source: GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 // [[T0002]] Description
The source states that the UAP's luminosity, trajectory, and timing were consistent with the Yaogan satellite triplet.
Claim #15680 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The UAP indeed displays all the typical characteristics of such a triplet: luminosity, trajectory, and timing are perfectly consistent.”
Source: GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 // [[T0002]] Description
The case is classified A as an observation of the Yaogan 20A, B, and C satellite triplet.
Claim #15681 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified A, observation of the Yaogan 20A, B, and C satellite triplet.”
Source: GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 // [[T0002]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
GAHARD (35) 01.07.2015 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.