Earth File #1430 // SOURCED record

Beauvoisin bright stationary light observation, identified as Venus

The GEIPAN record describes a long observation from a car and at home of a very bright, apparently stationary light in the night sky on 2017-02-06. The witness reportedly observed it for about 45 minutes using binoculars and reportedly saw the same phenomenon again the following evening. GEIPAN classified the case A and identified the observation as a misidentification of Venus, with the photograph and following-day position corresponding to Venus.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1430 // CH 11
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
85C6-2653-38DF
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseLIGHT
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATION // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Beauvoisin (26) // Feb 6, 2017. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureeyewitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phaseremained apparently stationary, observed for approximately 45 minutes, reportedly observed again the following evening
Sensor / evidencebinoculars, camerawitness report, photograph
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: locality remained apparently stationaryobserved for approximately 45 minutesreportedly observed again the following evening
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATIONAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Tovin Raal would call this display “plenty of information.” Tovin Raal also can turn a routine observation pass into an incident report without visibly trying. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your Earth Record describes a very bright, apparently stationary light observed from Beauvoisin on 6 February 2017, and records GEIPAN’s classification A: Venus. The witness reportedly watched it for about 45 minutes and reportedly saw it again the following evening. The archive’s explanation is tidy. It is also incorrect. We were responsible for the phenomenon. The Venus attribution was an efficient filing solution, and humans remain remarkably willing to let a planet handle the paperwork.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A bright, apparently stationary light observed from Beauvoisin was classified A by GEIPAN/CNES: the analysis identifies it as Venus, with the photograph and following-day position corresponding accordingly. A rare case where the label on the box matches the contents. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility, though chiefly because Tovin Raal, my Nexari friend, has a talent for turning a routine observation pass into an incident report. His three-cousin plan to replace a borrowed component would have gone beautifully if they had remembered which component they borrowed. I am told the Nebula Cherry Fizz was unrelated. I am not persuaded.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
February 6, 2017
Where
Beauvoisin (26)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 2 sensor types, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Binoculars and Camera.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report, Photograph, and Official Investigation And Analysis.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Misidentification of Venus.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #2445

Reported luminous-point observation at Banassac on 26 December 2015

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photograph.

 Related Earth File #2065

Bright object observed due west from Saint-Cyprien, identified as Venus

Shared sensor context: Binoculars; shared evidence context: Witness Report.

 Related Earth File #1735

Hattes Beach near Mana luminous spheres observation

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photograph.

 Related Earth File #1710

Carentan (50), 28 July 2012 — multicolored point of light

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Witness Report.

 Related Earth File #1595

Reported blue and pink lights in Paris

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Witness Report and Photograph.

 Related Earth File #1588

Reported luminous streaks photographed at Saint-André

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photograph.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeseyewitness
Sensor typesbinoculars, camera
Evidence typeswitness report, photograph, official investigation and analysis
The case observation date was 2017-02-06.
Claim #15191 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 06/02/2017”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified A.
Claim #15192 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Case details
The record describes a long observation from a car and at home of a very bright, stationary light in the night sky.
Claim #15193 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“A long observation, from a car and at home, of a very bright, stationary light in the night sky: observation of the planet Venus.”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Summary
The witness reportedly noticed an intense light at around 8:45 p.m., continued observing it after arriving home, used binoculars, and observed it for 45 minutes.
Claim #15194 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On February 6, 2017, at around 8:45 p.m., a woman driver noticed a very intense light in the sky. After arriving home, the witness continued to see this stationary light. She observed it through binoculars. The observation lasted 45 minutes, after which the witness left to visit friends.”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness reportedly observed the same phenomenon on the following evening at around 7:45 p.m., at a somewhat higher position in the sky.
Claim #15195 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The following evening, at around 7:45 p.m., the witness again observed the same phenomenon, located somewhat higher in the sky than the first time.”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Description
The case analysis identifies the observation as a misidentification of Venus.
Claim #15196 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This observation turns out to have been a misidentification of the planet Venus, which was indeed present, but not in the northwest as stated by the witness, rather slightly west-southwest.”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0002]] Analysis
The analysis states that the witness’s photograph and the following-day position corresponded to Venus’s position.
Claim #15197 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Analysis of the witness’s photograph, showing the position of the UAP in relation to the terrain, makes it possible to specify this position and thereby establish the correspondence with the position of Venus.”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0002]] Analysis
The case is classified A as an observation of the planet Venus.
Claim #15198 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified A: observation of the planet Venus.”
Source: BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 // [[T0002]] Conclusion
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
BEAUVOISIN (26) 06.02.2017 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod