Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness
Sensor typesphotographs with reference points
Evidence typeswitness report, photographs, astronomical identification
The case record is titled CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019.
Claim #14779 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0001]] Case details
The observation date is 16 February 2019.
Claim #14780 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“16/02/2019”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0001]] Observation date
The case is classified A.
Claim #14781 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0001]] Case details
The source summarizes the observations as multiple and lengthy nighttime observations of a luminous phenomenon that appeared static at a low angular elevation and was identified as an astronomical misidentification of Sirius.
Claim #14782 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Multiple and lengthy nighttime observations of a luminous phenomenon appearing static at a low angular elevation in the sky: astronomical misidentification of the prominent star Sirius.”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0001]] Summary
A witness observed the luminous phenomenon from the first floor of a house during the nights of February 15–16 and 18–19, 2019; it appeared static and was observed intermittently for nearly an hour each time.
Claim #14783 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“A witness observes a luminous phenomenon from the first floor of their house during the nights of February 15–16 and 18–19, 2019, appearing static in the sky and at a low angular elevation.”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness described the phenomenon as a large star brighter than surrounding stars and appearing to follow a curved trajectory moving to the right and downward.
Claim #14784 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“They describe the UAP as a large star brighter than those around it, appearing to follow a curved trajectory moving to”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported that a blue light was present at times, which the source explains as chromatic aberration.
Claim #14785 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness notes the presence of a blue light at times; this is chromatic aberration (see the investigation report).”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0002]] Description
Photographs showing reference points made it possible to identify the phenomenon as Sirius, also designated Alpha Canis Majoris, the principal star of Canis Major.
Claim #14786 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A few photographs were taken, showing reference points that make it possible to identify the phenomenon as Sirius (Alpha Canis Majoris), the principal star of the constellation Canis Major.”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0002]] Description
All available and analyzable data confirm confusion with the star Sirius.
Claim #14787 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“All the available and analyzable data confirm the confusion with the star Sirius.”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0002]] Description
The case is classified A as astronomical confusion with the prominent star Sirius.
Claim #14788 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is to be classified as “A”: astronomical confusion with the prominent star Sirius.”
Source: CHAVANGES (10) 16.02.2019
// [[T0002]] Description