Earth File #1361 // SOURCED record

Tournon-Saint-Pierre fixed luminous phenomenon observation

On 23 March 2020 at 23:08, a witness observed and filmed a fixed luminous phenomenon from a courtyard in Tournon-Saint-Pierre, in a south-southwest direction. GEIPAN identified it as the star Procyon, classified the case A, and attributed the reported color and image anomalies to camcorder defocusing and related optical/electronic artifacts.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1361 // CH 12
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
A310-3DD6-58A9
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATION // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Tournon-Saint-Pierre // Mar 23, 2020. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionremained fixed, filmed with a camcorder
Sensor / evidencecamcordercamcorder video, single testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: locality remained fixedfilmed with a camcorder
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATIONAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Tovin Raal would call this display “plenty of information.” Tovin Raal also can turn a routine observation pass into an incident report without visibly trying. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We did not cause or operate this phenomenon. Your GEIPAN archive describes a witness observing and filming a fixed light from Tournon-Saint-Pierre on 23 March 2020, and classifies the case as a certain observation of Procyon. The archive further attributes the reported colors and image anomalies to camcorder defocusing and optical/electronic artifacts. A routine stellar identification, then—not a Visitor operation. Our paperwork division remains uninvolved, which will disappoint it.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A rare pleasure: the label matches the contents. GEIPAN’s sourced record classifies this as a certain observation of Procyon, with the reported colors and oddities attributed to defocusing and related camcorder artifacts. The “not ours” finding from my side does not solve the human case; fortunately, the human analysis does not require my side at all. This is what a resolved record looks like: a bright point, a complicated camera, and no need to promote an optical problem into an interstellar incident. I have filed the matter under “ordinary explanation, unusually colorful paperwork.”
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
March 23, 2020
Where
Tournon-Saint-Pierre
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Camcorder.
  • Recorded evidence context: Camcorder Video and Single Testimony.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Procyon; apparent color and image anomalies attributed to camcorder defocusing and related optical/electronic artifacts.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typescamcorder
Evidence typescamcorder video, single testimony
The case concerns a long observation of a glow in the night sky filmed with a camcorder, identified by the source as a certain observation of Procyon.
Claim #14485 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Long observation of a glow in the night sky, filmed with a camcorder: certain observation of the star Procyon.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0001]] Summary
On 23 March 2020 at 23:08, a witness observed a fixed luminous phenomenon from the courtyard of their house in a south-southwest direction.
Claim #14486 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On March 23, 2020, at 23:08, a witness observed a fixed luminous phenomenon from the courtyard of their house, in a south-southwest direction.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness filmed the PAN with a camcorder, and a single testimony was collected.
Claim #14487 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness filmed the PAN (camcorder). A single testimony was collected.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0001]] Description
A Stellarium analysis placed Procyon within a few degrees of the reported azimuth and elevation at the observation time.
Claim #14488 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“An analysis using the Stellarium application demonstrates the presence, at that time, of the star Procyon within a few degrees of these azimuth and elevation values.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0002]] Description
The source states that the color and brightness described by the witness are consistent with an observation of Procyon.
Claim #14490 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The color and brightness described by the witness remain consistent with an observation of Procyon.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0002]] Description
The source attributes the perceived strangeness primarily to images produced by the camcorder and states that luminous points filmed with zoom produce optical and electronic artifacts.
Claim #14491 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The strangeness perceived by the witness results essentially from the images produced by their camcorder.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0002]] Description
The source identifies chromatic aberrations associated with defocusing as the explanation for the various colors.
Claim #14492 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The various colors, for their part, are chromatic aberrations also associated with defocusing.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as A as a certain observation of Procyon.
Claim #14493 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as A, as a certain observation of Procyon.”
Source: TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 // [[T0002]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
TOURNON-SAINT-PIERRE (37) 23.03.2020 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.