Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesphotograph
Evidence typeswitness testimony, photograph, official scientific investigation
The case concerns successive observations in a stormy sky of red luminous phenomena with slow extinctions.
Claim #14458 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Successive observations in a stormy sky of red luminous phenomena with slow extinctions: observation of a ball lightning phenomenon, globular ball lightning category.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0001]] Summary
The observation occurred during a storm on 4 May 2020 at 10:15 p.m.
Claim #14459 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“During a storm, on 4 May 2020 at 10:15 p.m., a witness observed a first phenomenon to the northwest”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported a bright red rounded shape that gradually decreased in luminous intensity and lasted 30 seconds.
Claim #14460 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“a bright red rounded shape that disappeared through a gradual decrease in luminous intensity, lasting 30 seconds.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0001]] Description
A few minutes later, the witness reported the same shape reappearing, followed by two other identical luminous points; the appearances were stationary and ended through slow extinction.
Claim #14461 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“A few minutes later, the same shape reappeared in the same place, followed by the appearance of 2 other identical luminous points, but at a distance from one another.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0001]] Description
A single testimony was collected for the case.
Claim #14462 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A single testimony was collected.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0002]] Description
The witness's description corresponds to globular ball lightning.
Claim #14463 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The description of the observation provided by the witness corresponds to a case of ball lightning of the “globular ball lightning” type.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0002]] Assessment
The Lightning Research Laboratory unambiguously recognized the reported phenomenon as globular ball lightning.
Claim #14464 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The testimony was submitted to the Lightning Research Laboratory, which unambiguously recognized a ball lightning phenomenon, globular ball lightning category.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0002]] Assessment
The Saint-Savin area was experiencing a strong storm event with numerous lightning strikes and intense intra-cloud and inter-cloud activity at the time of the observation.
Claim #14465 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“There were numerous lightning strikes, and intra-cloud and inter-cloud activity was intense.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0002]] Storm analysis
The visual aspects, duration, and movements were strongly compatible with globular ball lightning, and the photograph's colorimetry was also compatible.
Claim #14466 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The visual aspects, duration, and movements are strongly compatible with globular ball lightning.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0002]] Assessment
The source assesses a very high probability that the observed phenomena were globular lightning spheres resulting from generalized storm activity, particularly intra-cloud and inter-cloud activity.
Claim #14467 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“There is therefore a very high probability that these were globular lightning spheres resulting from the generalized storm activity at the time, and particularly from intra-cloud and inter-cloud activity.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0002]] Assessment
GEIPAN classified the case as A: observation of a ball lightning phenomenon in the globular ball lightning category.
Claim #14468 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as A: observation of a ball lightning phenomenon, globular ball lightning category.”
Source: SAINT-SAVIN (33) 04.05.2020
// [[T0002]] Classification