Earth File #1354 // SOURCED record

Saint-Jean-de-Liversay fixed luminous UAP observation

GEIPAN reports that a witness observed a fixed luminous UAP intermittently during three observation phases on July 8, 2020, between approximately 04:30 and 05:10, and photographed it with a mobile phone. GEIPAN classified the case A and concluded that the reported observation was a confusion with Venus; cloud movement explained its disappearance.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1354 // CH 01
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
8EE9-0014-1540
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Saint-Jean-de-Liversay (17) // Jul 8, 2020. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionremained in the same apparent place, disappeared after cloud obscuration
Sensor / evidencemobile phone camerawitness testimony, photographs
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: locality remained in the same apparent placedisappeared after cloud obscuration
FRED // ROUTING NOTEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We observed the observation. We did not cause the reported light, and we will not speculate about what did. Your GEIPAN/CNES record describes a witness seeing a fixed luminous UAP intermittently on July 8, 2020, photographing it with a mobile phone, and reports a classification of A: confusion with Venus. The record further states that cloud movement explained the disappearance. Our contribution was limited to watching the paperwork develop, which is a surprisingly durable terrestrial phenomenon.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A fixed light, one witness, a phone photograph, and a disappearance behind cloud: GEIPAN classified this case A and identified the observation as Venus. The label on the box eventually matched the contents, which is more than can be said for several much louder files. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors were observers here, not the cause—and their presence does not identify the phenomenon reported on Earth. Even my relatives occasionally manage to watch a perfectly ordinary planet without making themselves the explanation. I have asked them to try this discipline with paperwork as well. Results remain pending.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
July 8, 2020
Where
Saint-Jean-de-Liversay (17)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Mobile Phone Camera.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony and Photographs.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Confusion with Venus, with clouds accounting for the reported disappearance..

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1362

Reported luminous-point observation at Rustrel (84)

Shared sensor context: Mobile Phone Camera; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #1332

Cuttoli-Corticchiato luminous sky phenomenon, identified as a Falcon 9 rocket stage

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #1328

Gondecourt luminous-point observation — 6 June 2021

Shared evidence context: Photographs; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #1054

White stroboscopic lights reported over Onnaing

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #1126

Saint-Sulpice (81) — two orange lights, 27 August 2014

Shared evidence context: Photographs; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #1356

MIOS (33) 13.06.2020 — luminous phenomenon over Gironde

Shared sensor context: Mobile Phone Camera; shared evidence context: Photographs.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness
Sensor typesmobile phone camera
Evidence typeswitness testimony, photographs
The case is classified as A.
Claim #14416 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source identifies the phenomenon type as Venus.
Claim #14417 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Venus”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source reports successive observations of a fixed luminous UAP and identifies the observation as a confusion with Venus.
Claim #14418 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Successive observations of a fixed luminous UAP in the night sky: confusion with Venus.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0001]] Summary
A witness reportedly observed the luminous UAP intermittently between 04:30 and 05:10 on July 8, 2020, for an estimated total of five minutes across three observation phases, and took photographs with a mobile phone.
Claim #14419 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On July 8, 2020, between 04:30 and 05:10, a witness was intrigued by the presence in the sky of a luminous UAP that he saw several times intermittently.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the UAP remained in the same place between 04:30 and 05:10 and disappeared after the witness returned outside one or two minutes after arriving home.
Claim #14420 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The UAP remained in the same place between 4:30 and 5:10.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN concludes that the case is a confusion with Venus.
Claim #14421 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“this case turns out to be a confusion with the planet Venus (see the investigation report).”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0002]] Assessment
GEIPAN states that the position of the reported UAP corresponds to the position of Venus.
Claim #14422 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“It turns out that the position of the UAP corresponds to that of Venus.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0002]] Assessment
GEIPAN states that cloud movement explains the disappearance because Venus was obscured by a cloud.
Claim #14423 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“the movement of the clouds at that point in the observation explains the disappearance of Venus, which was obscured by one of them.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0002]] Assessment
Only one testimony was collected for the case.
Claim #14427 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Only one testimony was collected.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 08.07.2020 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod