Earth File #1314 // SOURCED record

Paradou (13) luminous phenomenon, 4 September 2021

A witness alone observed a luminous phenomenon moving regularly back and forth in a cloudy sky at 1:13 a.m., and recorded it in photographs and video. The video showed intermittent disappearance and reappearance, while the photograph showed the phenomenon motionless. GEIPAN classified the case A and concluded that the witness very probably observed a ground-based spotlight reflected from a relatively low cloud layer, with differences in apparent shape attributed to smartphone optical artifacts.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1314 // CH 14
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
A1EB-C4A6-92EB
NIGHT
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseLIGHT
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENT // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Paradou (13) // Sep 4, 2021 01:13. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phaseregular back-and-forth motion, intermittent disappearance and reappearance, appeared motionless in a photograph
Sensor / evidencephotograph, videophotographic record, video record
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: locality regular back-and-forth motionintermittent disappearance and reappearanceappeared motionless in a photograph
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENTAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The luminous spot was ours. We arranged the brief back-and-forth display over Paradou on 4 September 2021, then allowed the cloud layer and a smartphone to perform the rest of the documentation. Your Earth record reports that a lone witness photographed and filmed it; the video showed intermittent disappearance, while the photograph showed it motionless. GEIPAN classified the case A and attributed it very probably to a ground-based spotlight reflected from low cloud, with smartphone optical artifacts explaining the differing shapes. A tidy terrestrial filing. We approve.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The SOURCED Earth Record is unusually well behaved: GEIPAN classified the case A and found a very probable ground spotlight reflected from a low cloud layer, with the photograph–video discrepancy attributed to smartphone optics. In other words, the evidence supports a mundane explanation without requiring the witness to have mistaken the entire sky for a lamp. Progress, at last. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. Please file that separately: their admission is AlienBox lore, not evidence that the Paradou light was extraterrestrial. I am once again left reconciling a tidy human investigation with relatives who insist on submitting their own supplementary paperwork.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2021-09-04 01:13:00
Where
Paradou (13)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 2 sensor types, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 10 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Photograph and Video.
  • Recorded evidence context: Photographic Record, Video Record, and Meteorological Data.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classified the case A and described it as a very probable observation of a ground-based spotlight-produced luminous spot re....

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1291

Bright white point observed from TGV INOUI train 8483 between Paris and Poitiers

Shared sensor context: Video; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1075

Luminous point observed over Rouen on 24 May 2023

Shared sensor context: Video; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #870

Saint-Pabu luminous point observation

Shared sensor context: Photograph; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #715

Fort-Mardyck linear light observation, probably ISS

Shared sensor context: Video; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1358

Saint-Savin (33) storm luminous phenomena

Shared sensor context: Photograph; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1332

Cuttoli-Corticchiato luminous sky phenomenon, identified as a Falcon 9 rocket stage

Shared sensor context: Video; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesphotograph, video
Evidence typesphotographic record, video record, meteorological data
The case concerns an observation of a luminous phenomenon moving back and forth in a cloudy sky.
Claim #14025 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a luminous phenomenon moving back and forth in the cloudy sky:”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0001]] Summary heading
The observation occurred on September 4, 2021, at 1:13 a.m.
Claim #14026 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On September 4, 2021, at 1:13 a.m., an inexplicable observation in the sky was reported to us.”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The witness took photographs and a video of the phenomenon.
Claim #14027 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness took photographs and a video.”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The video showed an object moving back and forth, disappearing and reappearing intermittently, while the photograph showed the object motionless.
Claim #14028 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“In the photograph taken at that precise moment, the object is motionless.”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
GEIPAN assessed the case as having good consistency because a photograph and video were available for analysis despite the witness being alone.
Claim #14029 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“According to GEIPAN’s criteria, the consistency of this case is good”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0001]] Testimonies description
The investigation concluded that the witness very probably observed a luminous spot generated by a ground-based spotlight on a fairly low cloud layer.
Claim #14030 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The investigation concluded that the witness had very probably observed a luminous spot generated by the impact of a spotlight (skyrose), located on the ground, on a fairly low cloud layer.”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion paragraph
The explanation was supported by the circular shape, white color, lack of noise, and regular back-and-forth motion of the observed phenomenon.
Claim #14031 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The circular shape of the UAP, which is characteristic of such an impact light spot;”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0002]] Supporting elements list
Meteorological data indicated an intermittent cloud layer at approximately 1,700 to 1,900 meters.
Claim #14032 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“In the present case, an intermittent cloud layer was located at an altitude of approximately 1,700/1,900 meters (according to meteorological data).”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0002]] Cloud-layer explanation paragraph
The difference between the photograph and video shapes was attributed to an optical artifact caused by the smartphone’s automatic technical settings during low-light filming.
Claim #14034 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The particular strangeness noted by the witness, namely the difference in the shape of the UAP between the photograph and the video, is related to an optical artifact caused by the smartphone’s automatic technical settings during filming, under low-light conditions.”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0003]] Optical-artifact explanation paragraph
GEIPAN classified the case as A and described it as a very probable observation of a spotlight-produced luminous spot reflected from a relatively low cloud layer.
Claim #14035 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as A: very probable observation of a luminous spot caused by the impact of a spotlight located on the ground on a relatively low cloud layer (Skyrose type).”
Source: PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 // [[T0003]] Final classification paragraph
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
PARADOU (13) 04.09.2021 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod