Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesWitness
Sensor typesCamera, Video
Evidence typesWitness testimony, Photographs, Short video
The observation occurred on December 17, 2021, at 5:15 p.m., in Marmande.
Claim #13859 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On December 17, 2021, at 5:15 p.m., the witness was returning from work when, upon arriving near the roundabout separating the “Tridome” from the “Centre Leclerc” in Marmande, he saw a static luminous point in the sky, toward the NNW.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness first observed a static luminous point and later observed a bright object moving toward Marmande.
Claim #13860 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The object was shining brightly, and the witness thought it was the setting sun reflecting off it.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness described the object as two white blocks connected by a curved metallic-gray section.
Claim #13861 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“He then saw a shape consisting of two white blocks connected by a curved metallic-gray section.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
The observation lasted approximately three minutes, and the witness took photographs and a short video.
Claim #13862 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted approximately three minutes.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN assessed the testimony as well documented and accompanied by photographs and a video.
Claim #13863 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“For this case, the consistency is good: a well-documented testimony, accompanied by photographs and a video.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0002]] Case assessment
The witness perceived the object as moving in slow motion and believed it was not an airplane.
Claim #13864 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“It was moving in slow motion; I was already sure it wasn’t an airplane.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0002]] Witness statement
GEIPAN concluded that the observation was of BGA121J Beluga flight, a scheduled Saint-Nazaire–Toulouse flight that passed at the relevant time, azimuths, and angular height.
Claim #13865 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“After studying the file and the data obtained with various aeronautical applications, GEIPAN concluded that this was observation of BGA121J Beluga flight—a scheduled Saint-Nazaire–Toulouse flight—which passed at the same time, within the observation azimuths and at the correct angular height.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
GEIPAN stated that the Beluga aircraft was 63 meters long and approximately 19 meters high, and that its surface likely reflected the setting sun strongly.
Claim #13866 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“At 63 m in length and approximately 19 m in height, the Beluga is an out-of-the-ordinary aircraft.”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
GEIPAN classified the observation as A, identifying it as an aircraft observation involving BGA121J Beluga flight strongly reflecting the sun.
Claim #13867 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this observation as A: observation of an aircraft (BGA121J Beluga flight)”
Source: MARMANDE (47) 17.12.2021
// [[T0002]] Case classification