Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesMotorist/driver, Daughter, Two witnesses
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness testimony, CAPCODA air-traffic reconstruction, Official GEIPAN investigation
The case observation date was 2022-02-22.
Claim #13806 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
22/02/2022”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case was listed in the Aquitaine region and Landes department.
Claim #13807 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Aquitaine
Department
Landes”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified A and its phenomenon type was Aircraft.
Claim #13808 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A
Date updated
25/06/2026
Type of phenomenon
Aircraft”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0001]] Case details
On February 22, 2022, at noon, a motorist accompanied by his daughter was traveling on departmental road 16 between Magescq and Dax and observed a phenomenon.
Claim #13809 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On February 22, 2022, at noon, a motorist was traveling on departmental road 16 between Magescq and Dax (40), accompanied by his daughter.”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0001]] Description
The driver described seeing an airplane wing accompanied by part of its fuselage approaching from the left, passing at fairly slow speed, crossing the road, and disappearing behind pine trees.
Claim #13810 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On a long straight stretch, they saw what the driver described as an airplane wing accompanied by part of its fuselage approaching from the left.”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0001]] Description
The motorist initially thought the aircraft was about to crash because it was flying very low.
Claim #13811 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The motorist initially thought it was an airplane about to crash because it was flying so low.”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0002]] Explanation
The case had low strangeness and fairly good consistency, with two witnesses, a single fairly complete testimony, and no photograph of the UAP.
Claim #13812 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“With low strangeness and fairly good consistency* (two witnesses, a single but fairly complete testimony, no photograph of the UAP), this case turns out to be an observation of a military aircraft (see the investigation report).”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0002]] Explanation
The observation duration was reduced to 5 to 10 seconds and the field of visibility was restricted.
Claim #13813 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The description of the phenomenon evokes an aircraft partially obscured by the trees, observed under unfavorable conditions (reduced duration of 5 to 10 seconds and restricted field of visibility).”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0002]] Explanation
A CAPCODA reconstruction confirmed the passage of a military aircraft flying visually at approximately 300 meters, with trajectory and timing corresponding to those of the UAP.
Claim #13814 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A reconstruction of air traffic by CAPCODA confirms the passage of a military aircraft flying visually at low altitude (approximately 300 meters).”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0002]] Explanation
The aircraft was making a series of turns along the witnesses' line of observation, which the source says explained the perceived shape with a vertical wing rising above the fuselage.
Claim #13815 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“It also turns out that the aircraft was making a series of turns along the witnesses' line of observation.”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0002]] Explanation
GEIPAN classified the case as an observation of a military aircraft.
Claim #13816 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is classified "A," observation of a military aircraft.”
Source: [D16] FROM MAGESCQ (40) TO DAX (40) 22.02.2022
// [[T0002]] Explanation