Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesseveral people
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness reports, official scientific UAP investigation
The observation date was 2013-08-10.
Claim #13699 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“10/08/2013”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Observation date
The case is associated with Lower Normandy and the department of Calvados.
Claim #13700 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Lower Normandy
Department
Calvados”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified in category C.
Claim #13701 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
C”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Case details
The listed type of phenomenon is lack of reliable information.
Claim #13702 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon
Lack of reliable information”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Case details
Several people reported a silent passage of a dark, cigar-shaped object on Saturday, August 10, 2013, at around 7:30 p.m.
Claim #13703 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On Saturday, August 10, 2013, at around 7:30 p.m., several people were intrigued by the silent passage of a dark, cigar-shaped object in the sky.”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The object was described as flying with the wind, moving fairly quickly just below the clouds, with the discontinuous observation lasting 15 to 20 seconds.
Claim #13704 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“It was flying with the wind and moving fairly quickly just below the clouds.”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the testimonies were very precise and the witnesses very reliable.
Claim #13705 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The testimonies are very precise, and the witnesses very reliable.”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the phenomenon was moderately strange.
Claim #13706 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The strangeness of the phenomenon is moderate.”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The source presents an aircraft or drone as a possible explanation if observation conditions prevented witnesses from noticing characteristic features.
Claim #13707 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“the phenomenon could correspond to an aircraft or a drone if the observation conditions prevented the witnesses from noticing certain characteristic features”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0002]] Description
The source also presents an object carried by the wind, such as an airplane-shaped balloon, as a possible explanation.
Claim #13708 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“or to an object carried by the wind (an airplane-shaped balloon).”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0002]] Description
The investigation information did not permit a certain or approximate identification of the phenomenon.
Claim #13709 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The information collected during the investigation did not make it possible to reach a certain or approximate identification of the phenomenon”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0002]] Description
The case was classified in category C because of a lack of precise information about the estimate of the distance and the wind.
Claim #13710 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Given the information currently available, this case is classified in category C, due to a lack of precise information about the estimate of the distance and the wind.”
Source: VIRE (14) 10.08.2013
// [[T0002]] Description