Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesfemale motorist, single witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, no photograph
The case is titled CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013 and its observation date is 15/09/2013.
Claim #13598 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
Date of observation
15/09/2013”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified C and its type of phenomenon is listed as lack of reliable information.
Claim #13599 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification
C
Update date
23/06/2021
Type of phenomenon
Lack of reliable information”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0001]] Case details
The observation involved a light followed by the passage of a dark mass above the vehicle.
Claim #13600 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a light followed by the passage of a dark mass above the vehicle: lack of information.”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0001]] Summary
On September 15, 2013, at 4 a.m., a female motorist intermittently observed a light in the sky followed by an oval dark mass with small integrated luminous disks above her vehicle.
Claim #13601 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On September 15, 2013, at 4 a.m., a female motorist intermittently observed a light in the sky, followed by the passage of an oval dark mass with “small integrated luminous disks” above her vehicle.”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
No other testimony was collected, and the witness reported her observation in May 2014.
Claim #13602 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No other testimony was collected. The witness reported her observation in May 2014.”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The appearance was considered seemingly compatible with nightclub lasers on the night from Saturday to Sunday, but the hypothesis could not be confirmed from the available elements.
Claim #13604 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Appearance seemingly compatible with nightclub lasers (the night from Saturday to Sunday), but there are no elements making it possible to confirm”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0001]] Description
The source concludes that the UAP observed by the witness is of unknown nature and origin.
Claim #13605 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“the hypothesis. We can conclude that the UAP observed by the witness is of unknown nature and origin.”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
The case is classified C because there is insufficient information to verify hypotheses that are fairly compatible with the observation.
Claim #13606 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“This case is to be classified as “C” due to a lack of information making it possible to verify hypotheses that are fairly compatible with the observation.”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
The testimony is described as having good consistency but is based on a single witness and includes no photograph.
Claim #13607 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“This testimony has good consistency: it is fairly precise but comes from a single witness and includes no photograph.”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
The observation is described as strange because of the phenomenon's unusual appearance, although its movement itself is common.
Claim #13608 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“The observation is strange because it concerns a phenomenon with an unusual appearance, although its movement itself is common.”
Source: CABRIERES (34) 15.09.2013
// [[T0002]] Description continuation
