Earth File #1259 // SOURCED record

Reported light observation at Groisy

The GEIPAN case record states that on 1 October 2013 at around 9:30 p.m., a witness observed a light on the horizon from her home. The record further states that the UAP disappeared, followed by the rapid passage of three blinking lights accompanied by a resonating, airplane-like sound. GEIPAN classified the case C because the available information was insufficient to verify proposed explanations; a possible explanation involving Arcturus followed by airplanes was recorded but not formally established.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1259 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
FD29-7E9C-DA91
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported rapid motionLIGHT
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Groisy (74) // Oct 1, 2013 21:30. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureCivilian witness, Witness accompanied by partner 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionDisappeared, Rapid passage, Blinking lights
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness testimony, Official GEIPAN case record
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: locality DisappearedRapid passageBlinking lights
FRED // ROUTING NOTEShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We did not cause or operate the reported phenomenon at Groisy. Your GEIPAN record states that, on 1 October 2013, a witness observed a horizon light, followed by the reported passage of three blinking lights and an airplane-like resonating sound. GEIPAN classified the case C: insufficient information to verify its hypotheses. Arcturus followed by airplanes remains a possible explanation, not an established one. We have filed our denial under “not our lights,” where it will await proper bureaucracy.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A light, three blinking lights, an airplane-like sound—and a Class C file because the available information cannot verify the proposed explanations. The GEIPAN record’s Arcturus-then-airplanes possibility is sensible enough to investigate, but it remains a possibility, not a tidy conclusion. Directional imprecision and limited observation time have left the label correctly marked: unresolved. Off the Earth Record: this one was not ours. I regret to report that this does not identify what it was; it merely prevents my relatives from being blamed for every luminous inconvenience on Earth. Even at Gorkon Outpost, we require evidence before assigning a vehicle to a department.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2013-10-01 21:30:00
Where
Groisy (74)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony and Official GEIPAN Case Record.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Possible misidentification of Arcturus followed by a formation of airplanes; the explanation was not verified..

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #957

Clermont-Ferrand stationary luminous point observation

Shared evidence context: Official Geipan Case Record; similar witness context: Civilian Witness.

 Related Earth File #1109

Reported orangey light observation near Pertuis

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #840

Fontanes: several distant luminous phenomena reported before sunrise

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #833

Cogolin: luminous point with stair-step ascent

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #790

Reported Amiens observation of four luminous points

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #709

FAVARS (19): Reported scintillating luminous phenomenon

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesCivilian witness, Witness accompanied by partner
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness testimony, Official GEIPAN case record
The case observation date is 2013-10-01.
Claim #13511 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 01/10/2013”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] case details
The case is classified C.
Claim #13512 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] case details
The case type is listed as lack of reliable information.
Claim #13513 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Lack of reliable information”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] case details
The case record states that, on October 1, 2013, at around 9:30 p.m., a witness observed a light on the horizon from her home.
Claim #13514 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On October 1, 2013, at around 9:30 p.m., a witness observes a light on the horizon from her home.”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The case record states that the witness, accompanied by her partner, observed the disappearance of the UAP followed by the rapid passage of three blinking lights, accompanied by a resonating sound resembling that of an airplane.
Claim #13515 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“In the company of her partner, she observes the disappearance of the UAP and then the rapid passage of three blinking lights. This passage was accompanied by a resonating sound resembling that of an airplane.”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN assesses the case as having average strangeness and low consistency, citing a single witness and a short-duration observation.
Claim #13516 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Of average strangeness and low consistency (single witness, short-duration observation), this case may be a misidentification of the star Arcturus followed by a formation of airplanes.”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The record presents a possible explanation involving misidentification of the star Arcturus followed by a formation of airplanes.
Claim #13517 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“this case may be a misidentification of the star Arcturus followed by a formation of airplanes.”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The case is classified C because the available information does not enable verification of the proposed hypotheses.
Claim #13518 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified C, due to a lack of information enabling verification of the hypotheses put forward.”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0002]] Description
The case record states that the lack of precision in the testimony and information about air traffic prevent formal identification of the UAP.
Claim #13519 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“However, the lack of precision in the testimony (difference in direction between the account and the sketches), and”
Source: GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
GROISY (74) 01.10.2013 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod