Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesmobile phone camera
Evidence typeswitness testimony, mobile-phone video, official investigation
The case concerns an observation dated 14 July 2022 in Avrieux, France.
Claim #13436 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0001]] Case details heading
The case is classified as A.
Claim #13437 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case record identifies the phenomenon type as ISS.
Claim #13438 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
ISS”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0001]] Case details
The witness reported seeing a white sphere moving in a straight line across the sky from southwest to northeast for approximately five minutes before it was obscured by a mountain.
Claim #13439 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The UAP moved from southwest to northeast and was observed by the witness for approximately 5 minutes before being obscured by a mountain.”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported making a video of the UAP with a mobile phone.
Claim #13440 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness had time to make a video of the UAP with their mobile phone.”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0001]] Description
The case record states that the consistency of the testimony was average because there was a single witness and a video of limited use without visible contextual data.
Claim #13441 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“consistency* is average: a single witness and a video of the UAP that is of limited use, with no contextual data being present and visible.”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0002]] Consistency assessment
The investigation established that the witness had observed the International Space Station.
Claim #13442 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The investigation established that the witness had observed the International Space Station (ISS) (see the investigation report).”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The investigation cited the observed shape, white color, approximately five-minute duration, ISS presence around the video creation time, and a consistent straight-line trajectory as elements supporting the ISS identification.
Claim #13443 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This conclusion is based on the following elements:”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The investigation concluded that the mountainous environment limited visibility and prevented the witness from observing the ISS's entire movement.
Claim #13444 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“We also demonstrated that the observation environment, consisting of high mountains, limited the witness’s visibility, preventing them from observing the ISS’s entire movement”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0002]] Visibility analysis
The video was assessed as being of limited use because it did not allow the UAP's movement to be assessed and the object appeared blurred due to incorrect focus.
Claim #13445 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The video made by the witness unfortunately proved to be of limited use, since it does not allow the UAP’s movement to be assessed.”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0003]] Video assessment
The record gives the final classification as A and identifies the observation as the ISS.
Claim #13446 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification as “A,” observation of the ISS.”
Source: AVRIEUX (73) 14.07.2022
// [[T0003]] Final classification
