Earth File #1233 // SOURCED record

Reported triangular lights near Ailly-sur-Noye

On 2013-10-22, one witness reported a triangular object formed by red, green, and blue points of light. It was initially stationary, then moved slowly and silently; the lights became white before the object disappeared. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as a probable observation of an airliner on the Venice/London route, temporarily obscured by cloud layers.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1233 // CH 13
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
AF87-7F78-3DA0
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseTRIANGLE
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
TRIANGLE
Ailly-sur-Noye // Oct 22, 2013. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureOne witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phaseInitially stationary, Moved slowly, Silent
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness testimony, Official GEIPAN investigation and classification
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Initially stationaryMoved slowlySilent
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
That was ours. On 22 October 2013, near Ailly-sur-Noye, we arranged the triangular display of colored lights and allowed it to become inconveniently aircraft-shaped. Your archive records one witness describing the lights as stationary, then slow and silent, with the colors becoming white before disappearance. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as probably an airliner obscured by cloud layers. A sensible filing decision, though not the correct one. Fred will object to the paperwork.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classified this as a sourced B case: probably an airliner, with cloud obscuration and enough uncertainty about schedule and light colors to stop short of an A. Sensible. The triangle is doing most of the dramatic work here; the record itself remains a single testimony with no sensor data. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, you finally noticed us. That was one of my cousins on a routine pass, and the navigation-light theatrics were not approved. I know this because I was later asked to file the incident, the vehicle-use form, and a complaint about disappearing before returning the borrowed craft.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
October 22, 2013
Where
Ailly-sur-Noye
Morphology
TRIANGLE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony and Official GEIPAN Investigation And Classification.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN assessed the observation as probably an airliner operating the regular Venice/London route, illuminated by navigation light....

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #1131

Reported observation of seven bright points in Vieux-Boucau-les-Bains

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: One Witness.

 Related Earth File #878

Epinay-sur-Seine triangular-light observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #825

Bidart (64): three luminous spots in triangular formation

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #809

Limeil-Brevannes: three luminous points forming a triangle

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #793

Reported luminous points in V formation over Lyon

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: One Witness.

 Related Earth File #698

Metz reported two-phase light observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: One Witness.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesOne witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness testimony, Official GEIPAN investigation and classification
The case observation date was 2013-10-22.
Claim #13263 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 22/10/2013”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified as B.
Claim #13264 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source describes an observation of colored points of light outlining a triangular shape and identifies it as a probable observation of an airliner.
Claim #13265 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation in the sky of colored points of light outlining a triangular shape: probable observation of an airliner.”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Summary
A witness reported an object with a triangular shape composed of three red, green, and blue points of light; it was initially stationary, then moved slowly and silently, the lights became white, and the object disappeared.
Claim #13266 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness described an object of triangular shape, composed of three red, green, and blue points of light. The object was stationary, then moved slowly and silently. The lights became white and it disappeared.”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
Only one testimony was collected for the case.
Claim #13267 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Only one testimony was collected.”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN concluded that the case concerned the probable observation of an airliner observed under particular conditions.
Claim #13268 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“we can conclude that the case concerns the probable observation of an airliner observed under particular conditions.”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN classified the case B as a probable observation of an airliner operating the regular Venice/London route, illuminated by navigation lights, and temporarily obscured by cloud layers.
Claim #13269 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is to be classified as “B” as a probable observation of an airliner operating the regular Venice/London route, illuminated by its navigation lights, and temporarily obscured by layers of cloud.”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
Uncertainty regarding the aircraft's exact schedule and doubt concerning the reported light colors prevented classification A.
Claim #13270 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The uncertainty regarding the aircraft's exact schedule, and the doubt concerning the colors of the lights reported by the witness, prevent this case from being classified as A.”
Source: AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
AILLY-SUR-NOYE (80) 22.10.2013 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod