On December 9, 2013, at 17:15, a witness observed four compact, bright red luminous balls passing through the sky. Two were followed by two others; they appeared to travel in formation, disappeared while gaining altitude, and were photographed. GEIPAN classified the case as B and assessed it as a probable observation of Thai lanterns, with the wind-carried-object hypothesis fitting well.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 1222 // CH 02 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 29F8-034B-F362 DAYLIGHT
Reported motionSPHERE
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINED // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
Romainville (93) // Dec 9, 2013 17:15. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINEDDAYLIGHTGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionpassed through the sky, traveled in formation, disappeared while gaining altitude
Sensor / evidencephotographsphotographic evidence, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)5 structured claim(s)location precision: localitypassed through the skytraveled in formationdisappeared while gaining altitude
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINEDAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Those four red lights over Romainville were ours. Two went first, with two more following in formation; the ascent and disappearance were intentional, not a navigational emergency. Your record reports that a witness observed them at 17:15 on December 9, 2013, and took photographs. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed a probable Thai-lantern explanation, noting that wind-carried objects fit well. A respectable filing. Incorrect, but respectable. Gorkon Outpost still uses the same formation protocol.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classified this SOURCED case as B: a probable observation of Thai lanterns, with the wind-carried-object explanation fitting well. Sensible. The formation looks orderly only until one remembers that wind has never submitted a flight plan.
The Visitors are claiming this one. I dispute them. Off the Earth Record, our internal files place no AlienBox craft here. My cousin Zarnok Vell, a Krellian, once borrowed an observation craft for a midnight Earth snack run and returned with six brightly colored frozen drinks, one novelty cup, and no acceptable explanation for the mileage. He apologizes by bringing snacks, which is how I suspect this case was confused with another family incident. That is AlienBox lore, not Earth evidence.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2013-12-09 17:15:00
Where
Romainville (93)
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
5 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded sensor context: Photographs.
Recorded evidence context: Photographic Evidence and Official Scientific Investigation.
The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classified the case as B and assessed it as a probable observation of Thai lanterns; a wind-carried-object explanation fit....
What limits the record
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
